Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "CDT/Archive/survey/2013"

< CDT‎ | Archive
(What would you like to be the focus of the next CDT major release ?)
(What would you like to be the focus of the next CDT major release ?)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
*Better APIs for CDT developers 15 (4%)
 
*Better APIs for CDT developers 15 (4%)
 
*Better documentation in CDT code 13 (4%)
 
*Better documentation in CDT code 13 (4%)
*Bug fixes (stability, broken features, etc) 33 (9%)
+
*Bug fixes (stability, broken features, etc) 37 (10%)
 
*Better scalability and performance 36 (10%)
 
*Better scalability and performance 36 (10%)
 
*Better support for C++11/C++14 language features 23 (6%)
 
*Better support for C++11/C++14 language features 23 (6%)

Revision as of 22:21, 8 August 2013

Are you a CDT user or developer (CDT or CDT-based product)?

CDT-Survey2013-q1-chart.png

  • User 56 (66%)
  • Developer 29 (34%)

On which platform do you use CDT the most?

CDT-Survey2013-q2-chart.png

  • Windows 30 (35%)
  • Linux 51 (60%)
  • Mac OS X 3 (4%)
  • Other 1 (1%)

What would you like to be the focus of the next CDT major release ?

CDT-Survey2013-q3-chart.png

  • Improvements to the UI and usability 27 (8%)
  • Improvements to the user documentation 17 (5%)
  • Integration with other build systems 22 (6%)
  • Integration with other compilers 13 (4%)
  • Integration with other debuggers 14 (4%)
  • More Refactorings and Source generation 39 (11%)
  • More debugging features 22 (6%)
  • Improvements to the build system 14 (4%)
  • Improvements to the editor and source navigation 25 (7%)
  • More code analysis 30 (8%)
  • Better APIs for CDT developers 15 (4%)
  • Better documentation in CDT code 13 (4%)
  • Bug fixes (stability, broken features, etc) 37 (10%)
  • Better scalability and performance 36 (10%)
  • Better support for C++11/C++14 language features 23 (6%)
  • Other 17 (5%)

Detailed Responses

Q1: Developer
Q2: Mac OS X
Q3: More Refactorings and Source generation, Integration with other compilers, Integration with other debuggers

Make working with C/C++ as easy and assisted as working with JDT/Java. Clang, llvm/lldb



Thoughts

Back to the top