Difference between revisions of "CDT/Archive/survey/2013"

Revision as of 21:59, 8 August 2013

Are you a CDT user or developer (CDT or CDT-based product)?

• User 56 (66%)
• Developer 29 (34%)

On which platform do you use CDT the most?

• Windows 30 (35%)
• Linux 51 (60%)
• Mac OS X 3 (4%)
• Other 1 (1%)

What would you like to be the focus of the next CDT major release (8.0) ?

• Improvements to the UI and usability 27 (8%)
• Improvements to the user documentation 17 (5%)
• Integration with other build systems 22 (6%)
• Integration with other compilers 13 (4%)
• Integration with other debuggers 14 (4%)
• More Refactorings and Source generation 39 (11%)
• More debugging features 22 (6%)
• Improvements to the build system 14 (4%)
• Improvements to the editor and source navigation 25 (7%)
• More code analysis 30 (8%)
• Better APIs for CDT developers 15 (4%)
• Better documentation in CDT code 13 (4%)
• Bug fixes (stability, broken features, etc) 33 (9%)
• Better scalability and performance 36 (10%)
• Better support for C++11/C++14 language features 23 (6%)
• Other 17 (5%)

Detailed Responses

Q1: Developer
Q2: Mac OS X
Q3: More Refactorings and Source generation, Integration with other compilers, Integration with other debuggers

Make working with C/C++ as easy and assisted as working with JDT/Java. Clang, llvm/lldb

Thoughts