Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

CBI/Mar20 2012

Meeting

  • March 20, 2012, 10am EST
  • Eclipse Conference facility

Attendees

Andrew, Thanh Ha, Krzysztof Daniel (Chris), Paul Webster, David Williams, Kim Moir

Regrets:

Igor Fedorenko


Minutes

Bug 374666

Bug: Run CBI & PDE builds of platform in parallel

Discussed this bug in today's cbi-dev call. The consensus was:

1) If the qualifier(s) used for the CBI build were different, without development, the comparator tool wouldn't be useful. Conversely, with the qualifiers the same, it would work like it does today and help provide some level of confidence the builds were the same.

2) SR0 with one set of qualifiers and SR1 with another would likely trigger a re-download of all platform bundles. This isn't what we want.


M6 Rebase status

Thanh provided an update that he's rebased the code, and now rebasing the natives. He'll communicate any issues he runs into via. cbi-dev.


M5 or M6 packaging status

Markus was not present.

David questioned the emphasis on testing packaging at this point. Andrew noted it was for testing purposes and to discover any potential issues sooner rather than later. Andrew acknowledged the paradox of decreasing risk by trying packaging now but increasing the risk of the CBI dopple-ganger packages getting into the wild and causing confusion.

Agreement that it does no harm to try packaging early (i.e. now) to test, and that the emphasis should be on closing gaps to make the CBI build output the same as PDE build output. Our packages built should be kept low-profile to avoid them getting out into the wild.


Bug 355430

Bug: change primary builder to 4.2


Bug 370707

Bug: reproducible build version qualifiers

Igor can't make it today so Andrew requested we keep discussion for this one in the Bug.

Back to the top