Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "CBI/Feb7 2012"
< CBI
(→Not on agenda, still being tracked as work left to do) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Briefly discussed signing as per [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369798 Bug 369798]. More discussion and work is needed here. We'll revisit this. | Briefly discussed signing as per [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369798 Bug 369798]. More discussion and work is needed here. We'll revisit this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:CBI| ]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:14, 10 May 2017
Contents
Meeting
- February 7, 2012, 10am EST
- Eclipse Conference facility
Attendees
Andrew R., Igor F., Markus K., Kim M., Paul W.
Regrets: David W., Wayne B.
Not on agenda, still being tracked as work left to do
a) Platform specific code swt & launchers (Bug 370704) b) Do not generate new version qualifier unless there are actual code changes (Bug 367581) c) Isolate CBI platform build from uncontrolled software sources (Bug 369002) d) unexpected contents in org.eclipse.osgi.services sources bundles(Bug 370124) e) reproducible build version qualifiers (Bug 370707) f) Provide orbit bundles via. maven.eclipse.org d) API Analysis e) Junit tests f) Which execution environments will CBI build & test against
Minutes
Step through LTS-ready definition as captured here http://wiki.eclipse.org/LTS
- Details added to define suitably configured system as follows: git >= 1.7, java >= 1.6, maven 3.03. Agreement that an Eclipse SDK install is not needed for the CBI build.
- Brief discussion of deterministic given the same code and dependencies (aka. third party libraries). Agreement that so long as dependencies are pulled from a controlled source (as per item listed as number 9 currently), this should be so.
- Added test section based on Markus' request. We could use a little input on it to make sure it is sufficient.
Signing
Briefly discussed signing as per Bug 369798. More discussion and work is needed here. We'll revisit this.