Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Architecture Council/Meetings/April 14 2016"
(Created page with "{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" border="1" |- | Meeting Title: | '''Architecture Council Monthly Meeting''' |- | Date & Time: | Thursday Apr 14, 2016 at [http://w...") |
|||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
===All Attendees=== | ===All Attendees=== | ||
| − | * '''In attendance:''' | + | * '''In attendance:''' Eike, Matthias, Lars, Martin, Dani, Jim Hughes, Krum Tsvetkov, Maximilian Koegel, Julien (IoT PMC), Marcel Bruch, Wayne Beaton, Doug Schaefer |
* '''Regrets:''' | * '''Regrets:''' | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
* Feel free to fill in, but not during the meeting :) | * Feel free to fill in, but not during the meeting :) | ||
| + | ==== Welcome New Members ==== | ||
| + | * Jim Hughes joining for LocationTech | ||
| + | ** Mathematician working as a Software Developer, interested in Math underpinnings of GMaza (in the Hadoop Ecosystem) | ||
| + | ** Getting that project through the EMO's IP Review, been doing some other work on Locationtech | ||
| + | ** Started SFCurve, for distributed indexing; also got a proposal for GeoBench | ||
| + | * Julien Damien | ||
| + | ** Working for Sierra Wireless - security expert (authentication, encryption, ...) | ||
| + | ** Project lead for lightweight M2M and committer on Wakaama and Californium | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Wayne: New Member proposals ==== | ||
| + | * Has some member candidates in mind from Locationtech, who would be valuable additions but not yet very well known outside their communities | ||
| + | * Concerned about not making the 50% support mark from 53 active members listed on [[Architecture_Council/Members_and_Mentors]] | ||
| + | ** See [[Architecture_Council/Membership#How_Do_I_Become_A_Member_of_the_Architecture_Council]] | ||
| + | ** The active members list hasn't been pruned in a while but would still be at 48 or so meaning a need for 24 support votes | ||
| + | * '''AI Wayne''' consider offline with members | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Trademarks ==== | ||
| + | * Want to get more consistent usage of the term "Eclipse" on homepages, and especially external websites (like Mosquito.org or Github) | ||
| + | * Want a public transparent discussion | ||
| + | * Jim: Dealing with the Eclipse.org homepage was problematic so far, external organizations have been easier to deal with | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Lars: Mattermost Channel during meetings ==== | ||
| + | * '''AI Wayne and Martin to join mattermost during discussions''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== FEEP Work ==== | ||
| + | * Missing a public list of work being worked on (as per message from Dani) - '''AI Wayne''' check with Paul | ||
| + | ** Eclipse PMC was taken by surprise at some work happening - need to ensure there are committer resources for reviewing | ||
| + | ** Would need a better channel for communication | ||
| + | ** Mickael would be in a better position to discuss | ||
| + | ** Lars: One obvious missing piece is asking projects, if projects actually want the work requested by the AC ? | ||
| + | ** Wayne: FEEP should not be different than any other contribution - follow existing models | ||
| + | * Many list of items not claimed yet -- any need to change anything on the process ? | ||
| + | ** Wayne: AC did exactly what they were asked to | ||
| + | ** Suggest a forum with Paul and Mickael, how to better define work that people can reasonably do | ||
| + | * Should the EMO put more focus on sustainable solutions: going the extra mile to do it right | ||
| + | ** Wayne: should not be different than | ||
| + | ** Somebody who takes FEEP funding still has to play by the rules; | ||
| + | ** Doug: Need to manage expectations on what we get out of the program .. as well as what bidders can get | ||
| + | ** Martin so it sounds like there are learnings for now: | ||
| + | *** It's aceeptable for a project to reject a FEEP contribution if it doesn't satisfy quality needs | ||
| + | *** Projects should review proposals early and add constraints where necessary - in order to help bidders estimate size of the work | ||
| + | * '''AI Wayne''' suggest meeting time and invite interested parties | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Julien: as FEEP is primarily for IDE, why is it an AC topic and not a PMC one ? | ||
| + | ** Doug: AC is across all the projects ... don't have the IDE body (yet) but would probably need it | ||
| + | ** Martin: Keep AC as a "wide" body of attendees, fork out to subgroups as needed | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Great Fixes for Neon ==== | ||
| + | * Wayne queried the Git commit index to find contributions; will announce first 2 winners soon | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== EclipseCon F2F ===== | ||
| + | * The Google Hangout worked so-so for Marcel and Martin | ||
| + | * Wayne: Concept was OK but need to work on the technology | ||
| + | * '''AI Wayne''' transcribe his notes to proper meeting minutes | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Mentoring ==== | ||
| + | * Wayne: We still have some challenge with mentoring - will need to talk in a follow-up meeting | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Eclipse Che | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!--- | ||
==== Welcome New Members ==== | ==== Welcome New Members ==== | ||
* Tyler Jewell representing strategic member CodeEnvy | * Tyler Jewell representing strategic member CodeEnvy | ||
| Line 105: | Line 166: | ||
* Time to prune some members that have been dormant for long ? | * Time to prune some members that have been dormant for long ? | ||
| − | |||
=== General Topics === | === General Topics === | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 14 April 2016
| Meeting Title: | Architecture Council Monthly Meeting |
| Date & Time: | Thursday Apr 14, 2016 at 1100 Ottawa  HTML |  iCal
|
| Dial-in: | Let's use the Foundation's Asterisk setup for this call:
Participant conference extension: 701 then enter pin: 51968
|
Contents
Attendees
All AC Members are invited.
- PMC Reps please confirm attendance or list your delegate below. Every PMC is required to name a primary and backup delegate, and to ensure that one delegate attends the meeting.
| BIRT: | Wenfeng Li | Wenbin He |
| DTP: | Brian Payton | Linda Chan |
| Eclipse: | Dani Megert | Mike Wilson |
| Modeling: | Ed Merks | Cédric Brun Eike Stepper |
| Mylyn: | Steffen Pingel | Mik Kersten |
| RT: | Christian Campo | Tom Watson Doug Clarke Ian Bull |
| SOA: | Adrian Mos | Marc Dutoo |
| Technology: | Gunnar Wagenknecht | Wayne Beaton |
| Tools: | Doug Schaefer | |
| WTP: | Chuck Bridgham | Neil Hauge |
| LocationTech: | Jim Hughes |
All Attendees
- In attendance: Eike, Matthias, Lars, Martin, Dani, Jim Hughes, Krum Tsvetkov, Maximilian Koegel, Julien (IoT PMC), Marcel Bruch, Wayne Beaton, Doug Schaefer
- Regrets:
Agenda / Notes
- Feel free to edit, but not during the call!
Review of Last Meeting
- Architecture Council/Meetings/March 10 2016
- Still open items moved to #Action_Items
New Topics
- Feel free to fill in, but not during the meeting :)
Welcome New Members
- Jim Hughes joining for LocationTech
- Mathematician working as a Software Developer, interested in Math underpinnings of GMaza (in the Hadoop Ecosystem)
- Getting that project through the EMO's IP Review, been doing some other work on Locationtech
- Started SFCurve, for distributed indexing; also got a proposal for GeoBench
- Julien Damien
- Working for Sierra Wireless - security expert (authentication, encryption, ...)
- Project lead for lightweight M2M and committer on Wakaama and Californium
Wayne: New Member proposals
- Has some member candidates in mind from Locationtech, who would be valuable additions but not yet very well known outside their communities
- Concerned about not making the 50% support mark from 53 active members listed on Architecture_Council/Members_and_Mentors
- See Architecture_Council/Membership#How_Do_I_Become_A_Member_of_the_Architecture_Council
- The active members list hasn't been pruned in a while but would still be at 48 or so meaning a need for 24 support votes
- AI Wayne consider offline with members
Trademarks
- Want to get more consistent usage of the term "Eclipse" on homepages, and especially external websites (like Mosquito.org or Github)
- Want a public transparent discussion
- Jim: Dealing with the Eclipse.org homepage was problematic so far, external organizations have been easier to deal with
Lars: Mattermost Channel during meetings
- AI Wayne and Martin to join mattermost during discussions
FEEP Work
- Missing a public list of work being worked on (as per message from Dani) - AI Wayne check with Paul
- Eclipse PMC was taken by surprise at some work happening - need to ensure there are committer resources for reviewing
- Would need a better channel for communication
- Mickael would be in a better position to discuss
- Lars: One obvious missing piece is asking projects, if projects actually want the work requested by the AC ?
- Wayne: FEEP should not be different than any other contribution - follow existing models
- Many list of items not claimed yet -- any need to change anything on the process ?
- Wayne: AC did exactly what they were asked to
- Suggest a forum with Paul and Mickael, how to better define work that people can reasonably do
- Should the EMO put more focus on sustainable solutions: going the extra mile to do it right
- Wayne: should not be different than
- Somebody who takes FEEP funding still has to play by the rules;
- Doug: Need to manage expectations on what we get out of the program .. as well as what bidders can get
- Martin so it sounds like there are learnings for now:
- It's aceeptable for a project to reject a FEEP contribution if it doesn't satisfy quality needs
- Projects should review proposals early and add constraints where necessary - in order to help bidders estimate size of the work
- AI Wayne suggest meeting time and invite interested parties
- Julien: as FEEP is primarily for IDE, why is it an AC topic and not a PMC one ?
- Doug: AC is across all the projects ... don't have the IDE body (yet) but would probably need it
- Martin: Keep AC as a "wide" body of attendees, fork out to subgroups as needed
Great Fixes for Neon
- Wayne queried the Git commit index to find contributions; will announce first 2 winners soon
EclipseCon F2F =
- The Google Hangout worked so-so for Marcel and Martin
- Wayne: Concept was OK but need to work on the technology
- AI Wayne transcribe his notes to proper meeting minutes
Mentoring
- Wayne: We still have some challenge with mentoring - will need to talk in a follow-up meeting
- Eclipse Che