Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

EclipseLink/DesignDocs/219683

< EclipseLink‎ | DesignDocs
Revision as of 17:21, 21 February 2008 by Unnamed Poltroon (Talk) (Project overview)

Design Specification: Interceptors

ER 219683

Document History

Date Author Version Description & Notes
2008-02-21 Gordon Yorke Working Draft

Project overview

This feature will introduce Interceptor interfaces that can be implemented by users to intercept certain internal EclipseLink component interactions. This will include cache access, query execution, Call execution and others.

Goals:

  • Provide extension points that intercept internal EcliseLink operations instead of the current options of responding to operations through events.
  • Choose interception points that provide the best leverage.

Concepts

The following concepts are used in the document:

  • ORM.XML refers to the JPA specification defined XML configuration file which can be used within a persistence unit through reference in the persistence.xml or through default location (META-INF/orm.xml)
  • EclipseLink-ORM.XML (EL-ORM.XML) – EclipseLink’s native metadata XML file which is being defined along with its usage within this project.

Requirements

The following sections will expand the goals of this project into more concrete requirements.


Functionality

Design Constraints

Maintainability

GUI

Config files

Documentation

Open Issues

This section lists the open issues that are still pending that must be decided prior to fully implementing this project's requirements.

Issue # Owner Description / Notes

Decisions

This section lists decisions made. These are intended to document the resolution of open issues or constraints added to the project that are important.

Issue # Description / Notes Decision

Future Considerations

During the research for this project the following items were identified as out of scope but are captured here as potential future enhancements. If agreed upon during the review process these should be logged in the bug system.

Back to the top