Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
EclipseLink/DesignDocs/298985
Design Specification: Performance and Concurrency
Document History
Date | Author | Version Description & Notes |
---|---|---|
2010-01-06 | James | 0.1 Draft |
Project overview
This project groups several smaller performance related bug fixes and enhancements into a single unit. Its' goal is the improve the performance, concurrency and scalability of the product.
Concepts
Performance is concerned about reducing CPU usage and finding more optimal methods of processing operations.
Concurrency is concerned with reducing contention and improving multi-threaded and multi-CPU performance.
Scalability is concerned with clustering, large workloads and data.
Requirements
The goal of this project is to ensure that our product remains the leading high-performance persistence solution. Areas of improvement are determined through performance comparison with other persistence products and benchmarking.
Specific performance investigations desired for this release:
- JPA performance comparison with EclipseLink 2.0
- core performance comparison with EclipseLink 2.0
- JPA concurrency comparison with EclipseLink 2.0
- JPA provider and app server comparison through SPECjAppServer ® benchmark.
Design Constraints
The goal of the project is to improve performance of common usage patterns. Fringe features and usage patterns will not be specifically targeted unless found to be highly deficient.
Any optimization must also be weighed in its' impact on usability, and spec compliance. Optimizations that may have a large negative impact to usability may need to be only enabled through specific configuration.
Functionality
Each specific performance improvement is discussed separately below.
Building objects from ResultSets
Singleton cache keys
Testing
Both the existing performance and concurrency tests and pubic benchmarks will be used to monitor and evaluate performance improvements.
Specific performance testing desired for this release:
- JPA performance comparison with EclipseLink 2.0
- core performance comparison with EclipseLink 2.0
- JPA concurrency comparison with EclipseLink 2.0
- JPA provider and app server comparison through SPECjAppServer ® benchmark.
API
Config files
Documentation
Open Issues
Issue # | Owner | Description / Notes |
---|---|---|
1 | Group | What is the impact of the cache refactoring on Coherence integration? |
Decisions
Issue # | Description / Notes | Decision |
---|
Future Considerations
Continually improve performance.