Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:WTP Requirements Main"
(New page: At a glance, I think dates are a bit too aggressive. Offhand, I'm thinking they should be offset 2, 3 or 4 weeks. At "end" of schedule, instead of saying 'final' document in August/Septe...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | At a glance, I think dates are a bit too aggressive. Offhand, I'm thinking they should be offset 2, 3 or 4 weeks. | + | <del>At a glance, I think dates are a bit too aggressive. Offhand, I'm thinking they should be offset 2, 3 or 4 weeks.</del> |
At "end" of schedule, instead of saying 'final' document in August/September, I'd say "Initial Version", or similar. Then, I think we should schedule periodic reviews and updates. Is initial week of every milestone too much? | At "end" of schedule, instead of saying 'final' document in August/September, I'd say "Initial Version", or similar. Then, I think we should schedule periodic reviews and updates. Is initial week of every milestone too much? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :At 6/26 meeting we agreed, the dates are not too aggressive, as long as it's clear we will iterate, say, every milestone. It'd be good to get a concrete stack in the ground. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:50, 26 June 2007
At a glance, I think dates are a bit too aggressive. Offhand, I'm thinking they should be offset 2, 3 or 4 weeks.
At "end" of schedule, instead of saying 'final' document in August/September, I'd say "Initial Version", or similar. Then, I think we should schedule periodic reviews and updates. Is initial week of every milestone too much?
- At 6/26 meeting we agreed, the dates are not too aggressive, as long as it's clear we will iterate, say, every milestone. It'd be good to get a concrete stack in the ground.