Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Stardust/Competitive Analysis"
< Stardust
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
! Bonitasoft | ! Bonitasoft | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | License |
| − | | | + | | Eclipse Public Licens |
|a | |a | ||
|a | |a | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|a | |a | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Origin |
|a | |a | ||
|a | |a | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|a | |a | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |||
== Engine == | == Engine == | ||
Revision as of 05:38, 25 April 2013
Approach
On this page, we intend to compare Stardust features and functions with those of other Open Source BPMS to provide decision guidelines to the community.
We intend to create a fair assessment. Hence, we will consider any comment from representatives of the other products into consideration, adjust the comments in the comparison if we agree or at least indicate that there are contradictory opinions about the comment.
= Modeling
| Feature/Function | Stardust | Signavio | Activity/Camunda Fox | jBPM | Bonitasoft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| License | Eclipse Public Licens | a | a | a | a |
| Origin | a | a | a | a | a |