Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Stardust/Competitive Analysis"

(New page: On this page, we intend to compare Stardust features and functions with those of other Open Source BPMS to provide decision guidelines to the community. We intend to create a fair assessm...)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
We intend to create a fair assessment. Hence, we will consider any comment from representatives of the other products into consideration, adjust the comments in the comparison if we agree or at least indicate that there are contradictory opinions about the comment.
 
We intend to create a fair assessment. Hence, we will consider any comment from representatives of the other products into consideration, adjust the comments in the comparison if we agree or at least indicate that there are contradictory opinions about the comment.
 +
 +
= Modeling
  
 
| Feature/Function | Stardust | Activiti | Camunda Fox | jBPM | Bonitasoft |
 
| Feature/Function | Stardust | Activiti | Camunda Fox | jBPM | Bonitasoft |
 
| Modeling Notation | |||||
 
| Modeling Notation | |||||
 +
 +
= Engine
 +
 +
= Workflow Portal
 +
 +
= Document Processing
 +
 +
= Monitoring/Reporting

Revision as of 05:32, 25 April 2013

On this page, we intend to compare Stardust features and functions with those of other Open Source BPMS to provide decision guidelines to the community.

We intend to create a fair assessment. Hence, we will consider any comment from representatives of the other products into consideration, adjust the comments in the comparison if we agree or at least indicate that there are contradictory opinions about the comment.

= Modeling

| Feature/Function | Stardust | Activiti | Camunda Fox | jBPM | Bonitasoft | | Modeling Notation | |||||

= Engine

= Workflow Portal

= Document Processing

= Monitoring/Reporting

Back to the top