Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "LTS/July30 2012"
< LTS
(→Agenda) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The following people are planning to attend: | The following people are planning to attend: | ||
+ | ===Attended=== | ||
* Pat Huff - IBM (co-chair) | * Pat Huff - IBM (co-chair) | ||
* Jochen Krause - EclipseSource/Innopract (co-chair) | * Jochen Krause - EclipseSource/Innopract (co-chair) | ||
− | * Karsten Schmidt, Thomas Rastetter - SAP | + | * Karsten Schmidt, Thomas Rastetter, Jutta Bindewald - SAP |
+ | * Kurt Thys - CA Technologies | ||
+ | * Andrew Ross - Eclipse Foundation | ||
+ | * Krzysztof Daniel - Red Hat | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Absent=== | ||
* Paul Lipton, Kurt Thys - CA Technologies | * Paul Lipton, Kurt Thys - CA Technologies | ||
− | * | + | |
− | + | ===Regrets sent=== | |
+ | * Mike Milinkovich, Ralph Mueller - Eclipse Foundation | ||
+ | |||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
* CBI update & any questions arising from [http://wiki.eclipse.org/CBI/July25_2012 July 25th meeting]. - Andrew Ross | * CBI update & any questions arising from [http://wiki.eclipse.org/CBI/July25_2012 July 25th meeting]. - Andrew Ross | ||
+ | ** Karsten: Is the platform strictly necessary to get started? - Consensus was yes for operations, but we could get started in terms of testing. | ||
+ | * Karsten: Who has signed so far? | ||
+ | ** Each representative shared their status: SAP == Signed, CA Technologies == Expected today, IBM == Coming any day, Inoopract == Coming any day, Oracle == Coming any day | ||
+ | ** Bosch has provided a P.O. to invoice LTS against. | ||
+ | ** Red Hat has no plans to sign as an LTS member but has contributed heavily to the CBI efforts. | ||
+ | ** Andrew shared there are approximately a handful of additional organizations that may sign in the near future. Also, from the EMO's perspective, a handful is enough to get started. Agree with the team that September is a much better time to formally launch & PR. | ||
+ | * Karsten: Which projects are LTS ready | ||
+ | ** Andrew: Please see: http://wiki.eclipse.org/LTS/Projects | ||
+ | * Karsten: When can we get started with the infrastructure | ||
+ | ** Andrew: Juno SR2 - Feb. 22, 2013 is the planned go-live date. We'd welcome testers any time. |
Revision as of 09:41, 30 July 2012
This meeting is for the Long Term Support Industry Working group at Eclipse.
Time and Location
See the conference bridge details
Attendees
The following people are planning to attend:
Attended
- Pat Huff - IBM (co-chair)
- Jochen Krause - EclipseSource/Innopract (co-chair)
- Karsten Schmidt, Thomas Rastetter, Jutta Bindewald - SAP
- Kurt Thys - CA Technologies
- Andrew Ross - Eclipse Foundation
- Krzysztof Daniel - Red Hat
Absent
- Paul Lipton, Kurt Thys - CA Technologies
Regrets sent
- Mike Milinkovich, Ralph Mueller - Eclipse Foundation
Agenda
- CBI update & any questions arising from July 25th meeting. - Andrew Ross
- Karsten: Is the platform strictly necessary to get started? - Consensus was yes for operations, but we could get started in terms of testing.
- Karsten: Who has signed so far?
- Each representative shared their status: SAP == Signed, CA Technologies == Expected today, IBM == Coming any day, Inoopract == Coming any day, Oracle == Coming any day
- Bosch has provided a P.O. to invoice LTS against.
- Red Hat has no plans to sign as an LTS member but has contributed heavily to the CBI efforts.
- Andrew shared there are approximately a handful of additional organizations that may sign in the near future. Also, from the EMO's perspective, a handful is enough to get started. Agree with the team that September is a much better time to formally launch & PR.
- Karsten: Which projects are LTS ready
- Andrew: Please see: http://wiki.eclipse.org/LTS/Projects
- Karsten: When can we get started with the infrastructure
- Andrew: Juno SR2 - Feb. 22, 2013 is the planned go-live date. We'd welcome testers any time.