Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "LTS/June29 2012"
< LTS
(→CBI Update) |
(→Planning and next steps) |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
** Andrew shared some of the struggles recruiting LTS members. Explained some of the key feedback items such as backwards compatibility always works, never had an issue before, etc. | ** Andrew shared some of the struggles recruiting LTS members. Explained some of the key feedback items such as backwards compatibility always works, never had an issue before, etc. | ||
** Paul reiterated these points and agreed we need to take steps to convince people of the value of LTS. He rightly mentioned that this is a continual process. | ** Paul reiterated these points and agreed we need to take steps to convince people of the value of LTS. He rightly mentioned that this is a continual process. | ||
− | ** Ralph suggested using case studies from other areas such as Automotive to make the need and value more clear. ACTION: Ralph to suggest case studies & share with the team | + | ** Ralph suggested using case studies from other areas such as Automotive to make the need and value more clear. Positive feedback from others on this idea. '''ACTION: Ralph to suggest case studies & share with the team''' |
* Next Month's meeting | * Next Month's meeting | ||
** Differing opinions on how to schedule next month's meeting: fixed monthly date vs. schedule each manually | ** Differing opinions on how to schedule next month's meeting: fixed monthly date vs. schedule each manually | ||
− | ** | + | ** Andrew to send out [http://www.doodle.com/vgz27tkzr75ezutg Doodle invitation] & facilitate scheduling the next meeting [Doodle sent, '''ACTION: Everyone give input by July 6th'''] |
Revision as of 11:17, 29 June 2012
This meeting is for the Long Term Support Industry Working group at Eclipse.
Contents
Time and Location
See the conference bridge details
Attendees
The following people attended:
- Pat Huff - IBM (co-chair)
- Jochen Krause - EclipseSource/Innopract (co-chair)
- Karsten Schmidt, Thomas Rastetter - SAP
- Paul Lipton, Kurt (?) - CA Technologies
- Andrew Ross, Ralph Mueller - Eclipse Foundation
- Jesse McConnell, Jetty Project
Minutes
Experienced a bit of delay/audio synchronization issues for Andrew who was connected via. SIP. Switched to telecom dial in and it was better. Andrew & Denis investigating.
Quick updates
- Update on charter approval, IWG agreement, and other process items
- IWG participation agreement is approved and posted
- The proposal and charter are approved and posted
- Mike announced creation of the LTS IWG on June 12th.
CBI Update
- Platform build update
- 11 minutes and just 3 commands to build the Eclipse platform on any system with git, Java JDK, and Maven. This is a big step forward in terms of ease of use and flexibility.
- Signing service
- We now have a really easy to use web service for signing. It uploads the software to sign, and downloads the signed software in 1 command on-demand
- We're also working on MacOS & Windows signing which will be available later.
- Project status
- Building in the LTS forge today: Mylyn, EGit, JGit, CDT, Eclipse platform, tycho, m2e
- Working to adopt CBI: WTP, Stardust
- Others are moving on their own to adopt CBI. We either learn about them from their questions or as we step through the list of projects inventorying who's using what.
- Contributions
- Thank you to Red Hat (Krzysztof Daniel & colleagues) for a significant contribution to make SWT & Equinox launchers buildable with CBI.
Planning and next steps
- LTS Founders
- Please sign the IWG participation agreement ASAP. Deadline is July 18th.
- Press release draft for launch
- We'll circulate it in July
- Plan is for August release
- Recruiting
- Andrew shared some of the struggles recruiting LTS members. Explained some of the key feedback items such as backwards compatibility always works, never had an issue before, etc.
- Paul reiterated these points and agreed we need to take steps to convince people of the value of LTS. He rightly mentioned that this is a continual process.
- Ralph suggested using case studies from other areas such as Automotive to make the need and value more clear. Positive feedback from others on this idea. ACTION: Ralph to suggest case studies & share with the team
- Next Month's meeting
- Differing opinions on how to schedule next month's meeting: fixed monthly date vs. schedule each manually
- Andrew to send out Doodle invitation & facilitate scheduling the next meeting [Doodle sent, ACTION: Everyone give input by July 6th]