Difference between revisions of "Equinox/Meeting Minutes/20091013"

Latest revision as of 10:59, 13 October 2009

Agenda

• Left over from last week: Ways to inject through extension registry and e4.
• What to do about logging and tracing enhancements
  • 292135
  • 267683
• Retention policy

Attendees

• Tom
• DJ
• Pascal
• Andrew
• Jeff
• Simon

Minutes

• Retention policy
  • Once released always available, never delete old content
    • One repository containing SR1, SR2, SR3 for Galileo
    • One repository for Helios etc.
  • Eclipse project retention policy
  • For updates of the IDE
    • Folks want the latest to show up for doing updates
  • For builds
    • Folks want to have control over the versions and need durable repositories.
  • Concerns for performance
    • Duplication of artifacts
    • Could make the root URL (e.g. galileo/) the latest
    • Each new SR could get a stable URL (e.g. galileo/SRX)
  • Do we need to fix this now?
    • Do we need to get an SR0 URL for Galileo?
      • Would allow for us to test revert and check differences in mirroring.
    • Can we get by with make a stable SR1 an SR2 Galileo?
  • We should do the right thing for SR2 so that we know it will work for Helios
    • Pascal recommends a composite repo for SR1/SR2 of Galileo and restore SR0.
    • We will not know how much has changed until the exercise is done.
    • We need to make a composite repository with SR0/SR1/SR2 of Galileo to get experience.
      • We could make the constituents (SRs) a diff of the previous SR
      • Other option is to make self contained SR repos as constituents of the big composite repo.
      • Could make aggregate-SRs and stand alone SR repos.