Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Equinox/p2/Helios/Plan"

(New page: Kevin McGuire: - Not being on the team, I find it difficult to interpret many of the items and their purpose. It would be helpful if there was a "themes" section to describe the general t...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Kevin McGuire:
 
Kevin McGuire:
- Not being on the team, I find it difficult to interpret many of the items and their purpose.  It would be helpful if there was a "themes" section to describe the general types of work going on, then indicate which work items match which themes.
+
* Not being on the team, I find it difficult to interpret many of the items and their purpose.  It would be helpful if there was a "themes" section to describe the general types of work going on, then indicate which work items match which themes.
- A massive usability issue I see today is that when an install fails due to some incompatibility, the information the user is given to resolve it is dense, long winded, and cryptic.  It provides no practical help.  The user is left scratching their heads not knowing what's required or how to resolve the problem.  Is this being addressed?
+
* A massive usability issue I see today is that when an install fails due to some incompatibility, the information the user is given to resolve it is dense, long winded, and cryptic.  It provides no practical help.  The user is left scratching their heads not knowing what's required or how to resolve the problem.  Is this being addressed?

Revision as of 06:28, 15 September 2008

Kevin McGuire:

  • Not being on the team, I find it difficult to interpret many of the items and their purpose. It would be helpful if there was a "themes" section to describe the general types of work going on, then indicate which work items match which themes.
  • A massive usability issue I see today is that when an install fails due to some incompatibility, the information the user is given to resolve it is dense, long winded, and cryptic. It provides no practical help. The user is left scratching their heads not knowing what's required or how to resolve the problem. Is this being addressed?

Back to the top