Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "DSDP/MTJ/Discussion/Refactoring/EP"
< DSDP | MTJ | Discussion | Refactoring
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.ui.venderSpecJADAttributes''' | * '''org.eclipse.mtj.ui.venderSpecJADAttributes''' | ||
* '''org.eclipse.mtj.ui.jadEditorPages''' | * '''org.eclipse.mtj.ui.jadEditorPages''' | ||
+ | |||
== Refactory Suggestions == | == Refactory Suggestions == |
Revision as of 09:18, 29 January 2009
We currently have the following list of Extension points:
- org.eclipse.mtj.core.api
- Representation of an Java ME application programming interface (API).
- org.eclipse.mtj.core.configurations
- Extension that provides a listing of supported Java ME Configurations.
- org.eclipse.mtj.core.deviceImporter
- org.eclipse.mtj.core.library.MIDletLibrary
- org.eclipse.mtj.core.profiles
- org.eclipse.me.ui.deviceEditor
- org.eclipse.mtj.ui.venderSpecJADAttributes
- org.eclipse.mtj.ui.jadEditorPages
Refactory Suggestions
org.eclipse.mtj.core.api * Are we the only ones that implements this E.P? * Is it really necessary? since the UEI standard provides a way to gather the APIs from a SDK's device * The skeletonFile element is not used anymore