Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Cosmos Architecture Meeting 23-Jan-08"
(→Attendees) |
(→Minutes) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Martin Simmonds | * Martin Simmonds | ||
* Jimmy "The Godfather of Cosmos" Mohsin | * Jimmy "The Godfather of Cosmos" Mohsin | ||
| − | * | + | * Dominica Gjelaj |
* John Todd | * John Todd | ||
* Bill Muldoon | * Bill Muldoon | ||
* Jack Devine | * Jack Devine | ||
| − | * Sheldon | + | * Sheldon Lee-Loy |
* David Whiteman | * David Whiteman | ||
* Don Ebright | * Don Ebright | ||
* Joel Hawkins | * Joel Hawkins | ||
* Shivvy | * Shivvy | ||
| − | + | * Ali Mehregani | |
| + | * Hubert Leung | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
| − | == | + | === i8 QA === |
| + | * We have some derelicts that need to add JUnits to their enhancements | ||
| + | ** Mea culpa (ouch). These need to be done by COB today. | ||
| + | * We need to spin a new build to include fixe for 216076 | ||
| + | * We would like to review the release candidate build when this is finished | ||
| + | ** Review the acceptance criteria for the release | ||
| + | * There are some JUnits that are failing, we believe this to be because of the way the tests are being run | ||
| + | ** Hubert will update the test cases with instructions for setup | ||
| + | |||
| + | * David & Ali have run the JUnits for resource modeling and checked in the results | ||
| + | * We do a full regression test of JUnits | ||
| + | |||
| + | * We can revisit whose responsibility it is for running JUnits for i9. There was some discussion on determining who is responsible for running the JUnits, e.g. developers, QA, or both. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * How do we ensure we have a clean end-to-end test cases? Who is ultimately responsible for this? | ||
| + | ** We need to have an end-to-end use case for each of the use cases that we've defined | ||
| + | ** This is a priority for i9 | ||
| + | |||
| + | * We have escalated the need to integrate the JUnits with the nightly build process | ||
| + | ** There is an ER for this, 216211, which is a P1 | ||
| + | |||
| + | * We will sync tomorrow at 11:00am EST for a release close down meeting | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Open Discussion === | ||
| + | Due to the pressures of getting i8 out, the ability to get a good set of i9 designs out has been impaired. Tania/Mark/Don/Jimmy will regroup to help prioritize the ERs & Bugs we have for i9. This will help balance out the work and focus our efforts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Build Wish List == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[COSMOS RE AND BUILD WISH LIST]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:01, 23 January 2008
Attendees
- Paul Stratton
- Mark Weitzel
- Tania Makins
- Martin Simmonds
- Jimmy "The Godfather of Cosmos" Mohsin
- Dominica Gjelaj
- John Todd
- Bill Muldoon
- Jack Devine
- Sheldon Lee-Loy
- David Whiteman
- Don Ebright
- Joel Hawkins
- Shivvy
- Ali Mehregani
- Hubert Leung
Minutes
i8 QA
- We have some derelicts that need to add JUnits to their enhancements
- Mea culpa (ouch). These need to be done by COB today.
- We need to spin a new build to include fixe for 216076
- We would like to review the release candidate build when this is finished
- Review the acceptance criteria for the release
- There are some JUnits that are failing, we believe this to be because of the way the tests are being run
- Hubert will update the test cases with instructions for setup
- David & Ali have run the JUnits for resource modeling and checked in the results
- We do a full regression test of JUnits
- We can revisit whose responsibility it is for running JUnits for i9. There was some discussion on determining who is responsible for running the JUnits, e.g. developers, QA, or both.
- How do we ensure we have a clean end-to-end test cases? Who is ultimately responsible for this?
- We need to have an end-to-end use case for each of the use cases that we've defined
- This is a priority for i9
- We have escalated the need to integrate the JUnits with the nightly build process
- There is an ER for this, 216211, which is a P1
- We will sync tomorrow at 11:00am EST for a release close down meeting
Open Discussion
Due to the pressures of getting i8 out, the ability to get a good set of i9 designs out has been impaired. Tania/Mark/Don/Jimmy will regroup to help prioritize the ERs & Bugs we have for i9. This will help balance out the work and focus our efforts.