Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Cosmos Architecture Meeting 23-Jan-08"

(New page: == Attendees == Paul Stratton Mark Weitzel Tania Makins Martin Simmonds Jimmy "The Godfather of Cosmos" Mohsin Dominca Gjelaj John Todd Bill Muldoon Jack Devine Sheldon Leeloy David Whit...)
 
(Minutes)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Attendees ==
 +
* Paul Stratton
 +
* Mark Weitzel
 +
* Tania Makins
 +
* Martin Simmonds
 +
* Jimmy "The Godfather of Cosmos" Mohsin
 +
* Dominica Gjelaj
 +
* John Todd
 +
* Bill Muldoon
 +
* Jack Devine
 +
* Sheldon Lee-Loy
 +
* David Whiteman
 +
* Don Ebright
 +
* Joel Hawkins
 +
* Shivvy
 +
* Ali Mehregani
 +
* Hubert Leung
  
 +
== Minutes ==
  
== Attendees ==
+
=== i8 QA ===
Paul Stratton
+
* We have some derelicts that need to add JUnits to their enhancements
Mark Weitzel
+
** Mea culpa (ouch).  These need to be done by COB today.
Tania Makins
+
* We need to spin a new build to include fixe for 216076
Martin Simmonds
+
* We would like to review the release candidate build when this is finished
Jimmy "The Godfather of Cosmos" Mohsin
+
** Review the acceptance criteria for the release
Dominca Gjelaj
+
* There are some JUnits that are failing, we believe this to be because of the way the tests are being run
John Todd
+
** Hubert will update the test cases with instructions for setup
Bill Muldoon
+
Jack Devine
+
Sheldon Leeloy
+
David Whiteman
+
Don Ebright
+
Joel Hawkins
+
Shivvy
+
  
 +
* David & Ali have run the JUnits for resource modeling and checked in the results
 +
* We do a full regression test of JUnits
  
== Minutes ==
+
* We can revisit whose responsibility it is for running JUnits for i9.  There was some discussion on determining who is responsible for running the JUnits, e.g. developers, QA, or both.
 +
 
 +
* How do we ensure we have a clean end-to-end test cases?  Who is ultimately responsible for this?
 +
** We need to have an end-to-end use case for each of the use cases that we've defined
 +
** This is a priority for i9
 +
 
 +
* We have escalated the need to integrate the JUnits with the nightly build process
 +
** There is an ER for this, 216211, which is a P1
 +
 
 +
* We will sync tomorrow at 11:00am EST for a release close down meeting
 +
 
 +
=== Open Discussion  ===
 +
Due to the pressures of getting i8 out, the ability to get a good set of i9 designs out has been impaired.  Tania/Mark/Don/Jimmy will regroup to help prioritize the ERs & Bugs we have for i9.  This will help balance out the work and focus our efforts.
 +
 
 +
== Build Wish List ==
 +
 
 +
* [[COSMOS RE AND BUILD WISH LIST]]

Latest revision as of 12:01, 23 January 2008

Attendees

  • Paul Stratton
  • Mark Weitzel
  • Tania Makins
  • Martin Simmonds
  • Jimmy "The Godfather of Cosmos" Mohsin
  • Dominica Gjelaj
  • John Todd
  • Bill Muldoon
  • Jack Devine
  • Sheldon Lee-Loy
  • David Whiteman
  • Don Ebright
  • Joel Hawkins
  • Shivvy
  • Ali Mehregani
  • Hubert Leung

Minutes

i8 QA

  • We have some derelicts that need to add JUnits to their enhancements
    • Mea culpa (ouch). These need to be done by COB today.
  • We need to spin a new build to include fixe for 216076
  • We would like to review the release candidate build when this is finished
    • Review the acceptance criteria for the release
  • There are some JUnits that are failing, we believe this to be because of the way the tests are being run
    • Hubert will update the test cases with instructions for setup
  • David & Ali have run the JUnits for resource modeling and checked in the results
  • We do a full regression test of JUnits
  • We can revisit whose responsibility it is for running JUnits for i9. There was some discussion on determining who is responsible for running the JUnits, e.g. developers, QA, or both.
  • How do we ensure we have a clean end-to-end test cases? Who is ultimately responsible for this?
    • We need to have an end-to-end use case for each of the use cases that we've defined
    • This is a priority for i9
  • We have escalated the need to integrate the JUnits with the nightly build process
    • There is an ER for this, 216211, which is a P1
  • We will sync tomorrow at 11:00am EST for a release close down meeting

Open Discussion

Due to the pressures of getting i8 out, the ability to get a good set of i9 designs out has been impaired. Tania/Mark/Don/Jimmy will regroup to help prioritize the ERs & Bugs we have for i9. This will help balance out the work and focus our efforts.

Build Wish List

Back to the top