Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Planning Council/May 20 2009"
(→Topics) |
(→Attendees) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|Chris Aniszczyk || | |Chris Aniszczyk || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Cedric Brun || | + | |Cedric Brun || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Oliver Cole || | + | |Oliver Cole || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Stefan Daume || | + | |Stefan Daume || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Brian Fitzpatrick || | + | |Brian Fitzpatrick || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Wayne Beaton || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Doug Gaff || | + | |Doug Gaff || R |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Neil Hauge || | + | |Neil Hauge || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Mika Hoikkala || | |Mika Hoikkala || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Anthony Hunter || | + | |Anthony Hunter || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Oisin Hurley || | + | |Oisin Hurley || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Markus Knauer || | + | |Markus Knauer || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Christian Kurzke || | |Christian Kurzke || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Gary Xue || | + | |Gary Xue || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Ed Merks || | |Ed Merks || | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|Georg Schmidt || | |Georg Schmidt || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Karsten Schmidt || | + | |Karsten Schmidt || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Kaloyan Raev || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |David Williams || | + | |Thomas Watson || Y |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |David Williams || Y | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 64: | Line 66: | ||
==Topics== | ==Topics== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* Conclude Naming next year's release (Thanks Oliver). | * Conclude Naming next year's release (Thanks Oliver). | ||
:: See the [http://www.doodle.com/fqkqrc6nqzfby7ni doodle poll] | :: See the [http://www.doodle.com/fqkqrc6nqzfby7ni doodle poll] | ||
:: And especially last few comments in [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=271054 bug 271054] | :: And especially last few comments in [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=271054 bug 271054] | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ::: Helios. The runner up was Halley. (in case EMO Legal review finds issue with Helios). | |
− | :: | + | |
+ | * PC Decision on Categories in Discovery Site | ||
+ | :: Business Intelligence: See [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=275392 bug 275392] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: PC decide B I R C was ok (best we could do, this year, but subject to change next year, as they all are). | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: DSDP Category name change: [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277006 bug 277006] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: PC didn't like the exact proposal. Will comment in bug, and await reply. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: Good, brief discussion on this topic in general, for next year. May want to be more creative and consider multilevel categories, wizards that could help narrow interests (and "include source" checkbox choice), should also better represent _the_ packages that are available from EPP (e.g. "RCP Developer"). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * PC Position on off-cycle releases and use of discovery site (and EPP)? This came up in discussions about a Pulsar package. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Conclusion: we do not want to support off-cycle releases. But with following compromise: If a project still met all the normal "release criteria" set forth as must-do's by PC then they could introduce something new during SR1 or SR2 (that is SR1 and SR2 can have more than service, if important, and must-do criteria met). The reason for not supporting things off cycle was a. it is more work to support it, b. there is no opportunity for "simultaneous release" testing, c. it would dilute the meaning of "simultaneous release". | ||
+ | |||
* Review [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php project status] and determine actions to take. | * Review [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php project status] and determine actions to take. | ||
:: Are we happy with "must do" compliance? | :: Are we happy with "must do" compliance? | ||
+ | :: Judging from items not marked, it appears these are the projects of worst quality (or, worst adopter readiness?): | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::EMFT 20 | ||
+ | :::PDT 15 | ||
+ | :::CDT 14 | ||
+ | :::MAT 13 | ||
+ | :::MDT 10 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * RC1 update | ||
+ | :: Done yet? | ||
* Next Meeting | * Next Meeting | ||
:: Regularly scheduled one on first Wednesday of Month: June 3, 12 Noon Eastern | :: Regularly scheduled one on first Wednesday of Month: June 3, 12 Noon Eastern | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Upcoming topics | ||
+ | :::Frequency and dates of maintenance builds | ||
+ | :::Dates for next year's project plans | ||
+ | ::::Wayne volunteer to check how done in past, and if Board or EMOD had any critera (and the answer was "no", up to PC). | ||
+ | :::Build schedule for next year (start with M1) | ||
==Reference Links== | ==Reference Links== |
Latest revision as of 05:10, 24 August 2009
Contents
Logistics
Meeting Title: | Planning Council Conference Call |
Date & Time: | Wednesday, May 20 2009, at 1600 UTC / 0900 SFO / 1200 NYC / 1700 London / 1800 Berlin |
Dial-in: | For the call-in numbers, see the "Project Review" number on Foundation Portal page. |
Attendees
Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record. Topics
Reference LinksSimultaneous_Release_Roles and Simultaneous_Release_Roles/EMO |