Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Cosmos Architecture Meeting 29-Nov-07"
(New page: == Attendees == *Saraub Dravid *Valentina Popescu *Hubert Leung *Ali Mehregani *Bobby Joeseph *Tania Makins *Sheldon Leeloy == Minutes == * Bugzilla process for Enhancement Requests and...) |
(→Distribution via a Virtual Image) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Tania Makins | *Tania Makins | ||
*Sheldon Leeloy | *Sheldon Leeloy | ||
− | + | *Don Ebright | |
+ | *Joel Hawkins | ||
+ | *David Whiteman | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
− | + | ||
− | * Distribution via a Virtual Image | + | === Bugzilla process for Enhancement Requests and testing === |
− | * Common Error Management System 209227 | + | This is documented at [http://wiki.eclipse.org/COSMOS_dev_process COSMOS Development Process] |
+ | We are proposing that we amend the development process to include: | ||
+ | * Clarify that this applies to bug and enhancements | ||
+ | |||
+ | For Step #2 Add | ||
+ | * The testing and verification information (e.g. specific test cases) MUST be included in the bugzilla entry as a comment when the developer marks it "Fixed" | ||
+ | * When the test cases (JUnit/Manual) are checked in, they MUST have the bugzilla entry number specificed that they test | ||
+ | * The test case description MUST include the bugzilla entry that it addresses | ||
+ | |||
+ | For Step #3: | ||
+ | Add... If the user is not available/capable to verify the code, then it is the responsibility of the component owner to validate the code and move the bugzilla entry to "Verify" | ||
+ | |||
+ | For Step #4 modify the wording to be: | ||
+ | "Prior to the start of the next iteration..." | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | === Distribution via a Virtual Image === | ||
+ | * It would be interesting to kick this up to Bjorn. (Mark will send a note) | ||
+ | * The goal is pre-configured everything.... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Larger consumeability issue | ||
+ | * Can this be a simple pre-configured "virtual drive"? | ||
+ | * We already have eclipse authority to use/ship Tomcat. Why can't we ship a preconfigured runtime that does this. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * There is a concern that we should not require any commercial implementation/software. While the VMWare player is not open, it is free | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Everyone is up for an all-in-one package with a wizard. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Common Error Management System 209227 === | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[COSMOS Design 209227]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Like the idea of using WSDM spec as guidance | ||
+ | * Is there any impact in the annotation work? |
Latest revision as of 13:59, 29 November 2007
Contents
Attendees
- Saraub Dravid
- Valentina Popescu
- Hubert Leung
- Ali Mehregani
- Bobby Joeseph
- Tania Makins
- Sheldon Leeloy
- Don Ebright
- Joel Hawkins
- David Whiteman
Minutes
Bugzilla process for Enhancement Requests and testing
This is documented at COSMOS Development Process We are proposing that we amend the development process to include:
- Clarify that this applies to bug and enhancements
For Step #2 Add
- The testing and verification information (e.g. specific test cases) MUST be included in the bugzilla entry as a comment when the developer marks it "Fixed"
- When the test cases (JUnit/Manual) are checked in, they MUST have the bugzilla entry number specificed that they test
- The test case description MUST include the bugzilla entry that it addresses
For Step #3: Add... If the user is not available/capable to verify the code, then it is the responsibility of the component owner to validate the code and move the bugzilla entry to "Verify"
For Step #4 modify the wording to be: "Prior to the start of the next iteration..."
Distribution via a Virtual Image
- It would be interesting to kick this up to Bjorn. (Mark will send a note)
- The goal is pre-configured everything....
- Larger consumeability issue
- Can this be a simple pre-configured "virtual drive"?
- We already have eclipse authority to use/ship Tomcat. Why can't we ship a preconfigured runtime that does this.
- There is a concern that we should not require any commercial implementation/software. While the VMWare player is not open, it is free
- Everyone is up for an all-in-one package with a wizard.
Common Error Management System 209227
- Like the idea of using WSDM spec as guidance
- Is there any impact in the annotation work?