Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Planning Council/February 01 2012"
(→Issues or Exceptions) |
(→Issues or Exceptions) |
||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
:: Others? | :: Others? | ||
... code recommenders? | ... code recommenders? | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Anyone "dropping out" that should be removed from aggregation build? | ||
=== Plans === | === Plans === |
Revision as of 16:45, 30 January 2012
Contents
Logistics
Meeting Title: | Planning Council Conference Call |
Date & Time: | Wednesday, January 04, 2012, at 1200 Eastern |
Dial-in: | For the call-in numbers, see the "Project Review" number on Foundation Portal page. |
Members and Attendees
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: "Inactive" refers to Strategic Members or PMCs we have not heard from for a while, and have been unable to convince to participate. Those members can become active again at any time. Contact David Williams if questions.
Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record.
Y = Yes, attended
N = No, did not
R = regrets sent ahead of time
D = delegated
X = not expected
Announcements
- Any?
Indigo SR2
- Any issues?
Juno
Issues or Exceptions
- Any issues? Everyone in? Any exceptions known?
- Exceptions for projects not in M4, that still will to join Juno:
- Virgo approved during 1/05 meeting (from rt PMC list, will be in M6?)
- BPEL approved on mailing list (as in M5?)
- Others?
... code recommenders?
- Anyone "dropping out" that should be removed from aggregation build?
Plans
- anything to look at?
Juno+1 Name
- Appears will be Kepler (still being vetted)
Other Business
- Need discussion/decision on "what is allowed in common info center". Pros? Cons? Alternatives? See bug 369395.
- Thoughts on "Java Development Tools" category? See bug 369258
- Fair (and desired?) to add "provide non-greedy repository" to requirements? 'Should' or 'must'? See Provide_optimized_p2_repository section. I propose:
Clarification on 01/23/2012: the repositories produced and contributed (for Juno and subsequent releases) must use p2 publishers that use greedy='false' by default. See bug 247099 and the p2 Publisher wiki for some history and details on this issue of greedy vs. non-greedy requirements.
- Project Priorities:
- Still comfortable with "4.2 as primary"?
- Anything else?
Next Meeting
- March 7, 2012 (our regular "first Wednesday" meeting, at Noon Eastern).