Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "ECF Conference Call 1.25.2010"

(ECF 3.2 Release Planning)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
===ECF 3.2 Release Planning===
 
===ECF 3.2 Release Planning===
 +
 +
Scott has sent an email to the EMO asking for a release review in preparation for a release on February 19, 2010.
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
Hi Scott,
 +
 +
If you can have everything in place by Feb. 3, you can have the review on Feb. 10. That would mean IP Log approval, PC approval, and docuware -- the usual.
 +
 +
Once your IP Log has been submnitted using the IP Log tool, I'll add you as "pending" to the schedule. After the IP Log is approved, I'll insert the date.
 +
 +
Thanks.
 +
 +
Anne Jacko
 +
emo@eclipse.org
 +
 +
 +
 +
On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Scott Lewis wrote:
 +
 +
> Hi Anne,
 +
>
 +
> We (ECF project) would like to schedule our next minor release (3.2) for Friday, February 19, 2010.  We will need to do a release review prior, and so I would like to begin that process.
 +
>
 +
> Thanks,
 +
>
 +
> Scott
 +
>
 +
>
 +
 +
</pre>
  
 
===Other===
 
===Other===

Latest revision as of 14:05, 25 January 2010

Attendees

  • Scott Lewis, Ted Kubaska

Agenda

ECF 3.2 Release Planning

Scott has sent an email to the EMO asking for a release review in preparation for a release on February 19, 2010.

Hi Scott,

If you can have everything in place by Feb. 3, you can have the review on Feb. 10. That would mean IP Log approval, PC approval, and docuware -- the usual.

Once your IP Log has been submnitted using the IP Log tool, I'll add you as "pending" to the schedule. After the IP Log is approved, I'll insert the date.

Thanks.

Anne Jacko
emo@eclipse.org



On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Scott Lewis wrote:

> Hi Anne,
>
> We (ECF project) would like to schedule our next minor release (3.2) for Friday, February 19, 2010.  We will need to do a release review prior, and so I would like to begin that process.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
>

Other

Back to the top