Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "XML File Context Provider"

Line 3: Line 3:
 
Configuration Info
 
Configuration Info
  
TODO:
+
XML File CP TODO:
  
1. The getSchema() needs to be updated to follow the latest ontology.
+
# The getSchema() needs to be updated to follow the latest ontology.
2. The format of the identity data should more closely follow the Higgins
+
# The format of the identity data should more closely follow the Higgins
  data model and, since we control it, we can structure the XML however we
+
data model and, since we control it, we can structure the XML however we
  want.  Besides, I don't like the file format as it stands anyway.  In
+
want.  Besides, I don't like the file format as it stands anyway.  In
  addition, if we structure it right, we won't have to do any mapping of
+
addition, if we structure it right, we won't have to do any mapping of
  types from the XML to Higgins, it can just BE what we expect in Higgins or
+
types from the XML to Higgins, it can just BE what we expect in Higgins or
  even the consuming application (ie. CardSpace claims).  At any rate,
+
even the consuming application (ie. CardSpace claims).  At any rate,
  currently, that's not the case.
+
currently, that's not the case.
3. Respond to registry and configuration model changes when they are
+
# Respond to registry and configuration model changes when they are
 
   completed.  #2 should be done in conjunction w/ this.
 
   completed.  #2 should be done in conjunction w/ this.
4. Allow updates through IdAS APIs.
+
# Allow updates through IdAS APIs.

Revision as of 14:24, 7 March 2007

Work in progress ...

Configuration Info

XML File CP TODO:

  1. The getSchema() needs to be updated to follow the latest ontology.
  2. The format of the identity data should more closely follow the Higgins

data model and, since we control it, we can structure the XML however we want. Besides, I don't like the file format as it stands anyway. In addition, if we structure it right, we won't have to do any mapping of types from the XML to Higgins, it can just BE what we expect in Higgins or even the consuming application (ie. CardSpace claims). At any rate, currently, that's not the case.

  1. Respond to registry and configuration model changes when they are
  completed.  #2 should be done in conjunction w/ this.
  1. Allow updates through IdAS APIs.

Back to the top