Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "WTP Smoke Test Results R350 01172013"

(Smoke Test Promotion votes)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 39: Line 39:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|JSF
 
|JSF
| align="center" | [[Image:Questionmark.gif]]
+
| align="center" | [[Image:Checkmark.gif]]
|  
+
| IMT
 +
[https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=398458 Bug 398458] tracks JUnit failures.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Dali
 
|Dali
Line 51: Line 52:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Web Services, WSDL
 
|Web Services, WSDL
| align="center" |[[Image:Questionmark.gif]]
+
| align="center" |[[Image:Checkmark.gif]]
|[[Image:Questionmark.gif]]Web Services  
+
|[[Image:Checkmark.gif]]Web Services (kc)
  
[[Image:Questionmark.gif]]WSDL  
+
[[Image:Checkmark.gif]]WSDL (kc) Retested with I-3.5.0-20130118203132 [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=398460 398460]
  
[[Image:Questionmark.gif]]JAXWS  
+
[[Image:Checkmark.gif]]JAXWS (sc) I-3.5.0-20130117040120 build tested
 
|-
 
|-
 
| JSDT
 
| JSDT
| align="center" | [[Image:Questionmark.gif]]
+
| align="center" | [[Image:Checkmark.gif]]
|
+
|nd
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Source Editing
 
|Source Editing
| align="center" |[[Image:Questionmark.gif]]
+
| align="center" |[[Image:Checkmark.gif]]
|[[Image:Questionmark.gif]]XML + JSP  
+
|[[Image:Checkmark.gif]]XML + JSP (ns) Retested with I-3.5.0-20130118203132 [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=398460 398460]
  
[[Image:Questionmark.gif]]XSD  
+
[[Image:Checkmark.gif]]XSD (kc) Retested with I-3.5.0-20130118203132 [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=398460 398460]
  
 
|-
 
|-

Latest revision as of 10:20, 21 January 2013

Smoke Test Promotion votes

Instructions:

Use a red X (fail) icon (Fail.gif) to signify that the build should not be promoted, that a respin is required. In that case, please provide bug number and be sure those that need to fix something are aware of it, and can arrange for a respin. Once the issue has been fixed, and confirmed, change the red X to a green check mark with the build Id where is was verified, so those doing the promotion know its ready to go.

If a smoke test does not pass but the build can still be promoted, use a green check mark (ok) icon (Checkmark.gif) but then document in the comments bug numbers, how the smoke test fails, workarounds, or cautions about the build.

If a build can be promoted and no issues were found, simple use the green check mark and include the initials or names of who performed the test.

Remember the significant column for promoting a build is the left-most project column. If some component within a project has not (or can not) be tested, the Project Lead should either make sure someone does the test, or make a judgment call on if the build (from their project's point of view) can be promoted or not. If the smoke test could not be performed, a note should be made in the comments section that it wasn't performed, why, and why that should prevent promotion.

Keep in mind the threshold for promoting a build gets higher as we near a milestone or near a release.

This Week's Results
Project Vote Initials Comments
Java EE Checkmark.gif KR
JSF Checkmark.gif IMT

Bug 398458 tracks JUnit failures.

Dali Checkmark.gif NL
Server Checkmark.gif SH
Web Services, WSDL Checkmark.gif Checkmark.gifWeb Services (kc)

Checkmark.gifWSDL (kc) Retested with I-3.5.0-20130118203132 398460

Checkmark.gifJAXWS (sc) I-3.5.0-20130117040120 build tested

JSDT Checkmark.gif nd
Source Editing Checkmark.gif Checkmark.gifXML + JSP (ns) Retested with I-3.5.0-20130118203132 398460

Checkmark.gifXSD (kc) Retested with I-3.5.0-20130118203132 398460

Release Engineering Questionmark.gif


Smoke Test ok to promote vote = Checkmark.gif
Smoke Test do not promote vote = Fail.gif
Smoke Test Pending = Questionmark.gif


Back to the WTP Smoke Test Results Main Page