Difference between revisions of "WTP 2010-10-07"

From Eclipsepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
(WTP 3.2.3)
(Other business)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 106: Line 106:
 
=== Announcements And Special Reports  ===
 
=== Announcements And Special Reports  ===
  
* ?
+
* Welcome to Mark Hutchinson as new webservices committer.
 +
* Cool stuff coming up:
 +
::[http://www.eclipsecon.org/summiteurope2010/ ESE 2010]
 +
::[http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse_DemoCamps_November_2010/RTP RTP DemoCamp]
  
 
=== WTP Calendar  ===
 
=== WTP Calendar  ===
Line 130: Line 133:
  
 
Smoke tests and declared M builds will resume in ... January? (Or, when requested? Nov?)
 
Smoke tests and declared M builds will resume in ... January? (Or, when requested? Nov?)
 
+
: See [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/wtp-dev/msg07850.html Carl's proposal].
 +
:: ''There wasn't much discussion/comment today ... but was just posted ... we'll discuss more next week, and try to finalize next week. Please raise comments or counter proposals to wtp-dev list''
  
  
Line 182: Line 186:
 
== WTP 3.3.0  ==
 
== WTP 3.3.0  ==
  
Congratulations on Indigo M2
 
  
No smoke test or declared build this week (planning week).
+
* Ready to declare [[WTP_Smoke_Test_Results| latest build]]?
 +
 
 +
:[Anticipated completion Friday morning (EEST)]
  
  
Line 235: Line 240:
 
=== Schedule ===
 
=== Schedule ===
  
8/13 WTP M1 (and first declared build)
+
8/13 WTP M1  
  
9/24 WTP M2 (technically contribute to Indigo on Tuesday, +2 day)
+
9/24 WTP M2
  
 
== Other business  ==
 
== Other business  ==
  
* Rob's [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/wtp-dev/msg07828.html query to wtp-dev]? Server Tools question or Module Core question?
+
* Rob's [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/wtp-dev/msg07828.html query to wtp-dev]? Server Tools question or Module Core question? Done (or ... in progress).
 +
::''They had a quick phone call this week, will (likely) turn into a feature request for WTP 3.3''
 +
 
 +
* Dali's CVS restructure: done.
 +
:[http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dali-dev/msg01013.html caution urged] on feature nesting. ('''TBD''')
 +
 
 +
* Do we need a feature patch in webtools/helios/repository for {{bug|321602}}. Is it a blocker? (in effect) Is it a regression? (since which release?)
 +
::''Is a regression since Galileo ... just not noticed in Helios initial release. Starts to effect performance with as few as 3 or so projects. Will investigate.''
  
* Dali's CVS restructure: done?
+
* Any opinions on archived repo? I'm leaning towards offering just one, since saves only about 40 M for some people, but wastes 130 M by duplicating. Plus ... then the archive literally matches what's available via http.
:caution urged on feature nesting.
+
::''One suggestion was made to keep the unit tests in a completely different repo''. (so could then just have smaller zip of tests only). Will investigate that. See if that complicates build scripts (or, simplifies?)
  
 
== References  ==
 
== References  ==

Latest revision as of 14:32, 7 October 2010

Contents

[edit] WTP Development Status Meeting

[edit] Attendees

Project Leads
Carl
Tim
Keith
Nitin
Chuck
Kaloyan
Raghu
Neil
David
Committers
Bob
Konstantin
Chris
Dave
Larry
Kate
Angel
Valentin
Paul
Nick
Gabriel
Eric
Rob
Sam
Friends
Elson
Ian
Aidyl

Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record.

Remember, any committer can add an agenda item. Typically, short announcements or news items go in the "Announcements" section at the beginning. Longer items or issues requiring discussion should go in the "Other business" section at end.

[edit] Announcements And Special Reports

  • Welcome to Mark Hutchinson as new webservices committer.
  • Cool stuff coming up:
ESE 2010
RTP DemoCamp

[edit] WTP Calendar

(Weekly Google Calendar updated through June, 2010)


For Indigo/Helios overall dates, see a Simultaneous Release Calendar



[edit] WTP 3.2.3

3.2.3 builds are running on R3_2_maintenance maps (and R2_3_maintenance for Dali)

Still needs work on releng tests and exact distribution zips

Smoke tests and declared M builds will resume in ... January? (Or, when requested? Nov?)

See Carl's proposal.
There wasn't much discussion/comment today ... but was just posted ... we'll discuss more next week, and try to finalize next week. Please raise comments or counter proposals to wtp-dev list



[edit] WTP 3.3.0

[Anticipated completion Friday morning (EEST)]


[edit] Planning

  • Project Leads: See subproject plan documents under standard-project-plans\indigo\
  • Initial Planning document by M2
  • Iterate/Review plans by M3
  • Final Plans by M4


[edit] Themes

  • improve Java EE 6 support
  • e4 (Eclipse 4.1) tolerance (no exploitation of non compatible function planned)
  • Objective is to work with both Platform 3.7 and 4.1 (with only one set of compiled code ... compiled against 3.7)
See briefest Eclipse 4.0 intro. One thing I forgot there, was a pointer to e4-dev mailing list ... that's were Eclipse 4.0 builds are currently discussed, announced (in addition to e4-only topics).


[edit] Other Candidate Themes?

Anyone interested in these? Resources available? Do they cross projects, or just enhancement to one or two?

  • Maven enablement support (at least make more friendly for maven users, if not direct support)
  • OSGi enterprise support
  • Any items from "top 10" list of problems to focus on. deadlocks? performance? modularity? api? test coverage?
  • ... ?

[edit] Schedule

8/13 WTP M1

9/24 WTP M2

[edit] Other business

  • Rob's query to wtp-dev? Server Tools question or Module Core question? Done (or ... in progress).
They had a quick phone call this week, will (likely) turn into a feature request for WTP 3.3
  • Dali's CVS restructure: done.
caution urged on feature nesting. (TBD)
  • Do we need a feature patch in webtools/helios/repository for bug 321602. Is it a blocker? (in effect) Is it a regression? (since which release?)
Is a regression since Galileo ... just not noticed in Helios initial release. Starts to effect performance with as few as 3 or so projects. Will investigate.
  • Any opinions on archived repo? I'm leaning towards offering just one, since saves only about 40 M for some people, but wastes 130 M by duplicating. Plus ... then the archive literally matches what's available via http.
One suggestion was made to keep the unit tests in a completely different repo. (so could then just have smaller zip of tests only). Will investigate that. See if that complicates build scripts (or, simplifies?)

[edit] References


Also, see

WTP 3.2.x maintenance release plan

how/when to branch code?

WTP_3.2_Ramp_down_Plan_for_Helios

IP Logs selector

WTP Helios retrospective.


See also the WTP Meeting Archive-Reference Page.