Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Technology/Subproject Termination Review 2013"

Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Eclipse Technology Project]]
+
This page serves as the documentation for the Technology Subproject [[http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Review_Information_for_Project_Leads#Termination_.28Archive.29_Reviews|Termination Review]] 2013.
 
+
This page is moderated by the Technology PMC and EMO.
+
  
 
*Review date: December 2013
 
*Review date: December 2013
Line 31: Line 29:
  
 
Prior to engaging in the archival process, I'd like to fork the examples on GitHub.
 
Prior to engaging in the archival process, I'd like to fork the examples on GitHub.
 +
 +
<hr/>
 +
This page is moderated by the Technology PMC and EMO.
 +
[[Category:Eclipse Technology Project]]

Revision as of 16:11, 11 November 2013

This page serves as the documentation for the Technology Subproject [Review] 2013.

  • Review date: December 2013
  • Communication channel: Talk:Technology/Subproject_Termination_Review_2013

Projects

The following projects are candidates for termination, subject to review by the PMC.

g-Eclipse

g-Eclipse has had no apparent activity for at least two years.

IMP

IMP has had no apparent activity. Project claims to have moved to GitHub.

Voice Tools

Voice Tools has almost no activity; though there has, apparently, been some activity in 2013 that should be investigated. The project lead recently retired himself as a committer (but remains as project lead, which is a little weird).

IDE for Education

IDE4EDU is very dead. There has been no activity for two years.

Examples

Good idea. No activity.

Prior to engaging in the archival process, I'd like to fork the examples on GitHub.


This page is moderated by the Technology PMC and EMO.