Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rich Client Platform"
m |
(→Re: delete Martin Perez weblogs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Re: delete Martin Perez weblogs=== | ===Re: delete Martin Perez weblogs=== | ||
It's best not to dirty up the page to discuss a change, that's what this page is for. And those pages seem to be added by [[User:Nick]], they don't seem to be self-promotion or anything, why delete them? [[User:Psylence519.gmail.com|Psylence519.gmail.com]] 16:30, 17 June 2006 (EDT) | It's best not to dirty up the page to discuss a change, that's what this page is for. And those pages seem to be added by [[User:Nick]], they don't seem to be self-promotion or anything, why delete them? [[User:Psylence519.gmail.com|Psylence519.gmail.com]] 16:30, 17 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===contradiction=== | ||
| + | "Applications other than IDEs can be built using a subset of the platform" | ||
| + | "Rich Client Platform is the minimal set of plug-ins needed to build a platform application" | ||
| + | Looks like a contradiction to me. | ||
| + | The first sentence says, that you can build applications with a subset of RCP and the second says you can't. | ||
| + | |||
| + | And I like to know why it's called it a rich '''client''' plattform. | ||
| + | Has ist something to do with the client/server architecture? | ||
Revision as of 05:49, 29 August 2008
Re: delete Martin Perez weblogs
It's best not to dirty up the page to discuss a change, that's what this page is for. And those pages seem to be added by User:Nick, they don't seem to be self-promotion or anything, why delete them? Psylence519.gmail.com 16:30, 17 June 2006 (EDT)
contradiction
"Applications other than IDEs can be built using a subset of the platform" "Rich Client Platform is the minimal set of plug-ins needed to build a platform application" Looks like a contradiction to me. The first sentence says, that you can build applications with a subset of RCP and the second says you can't.
And I like to know why it's called it a rich client plattform. Has ist something to do with the client/server architecture?