Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Platform UI Error Handling"

 
(StatusManager API - use interfaces)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
In the introduction it says that this proposal is for error messages only and does not include Log or trace etc. However, in the issues section it talks about "Error message, error dialog, error in the console view, error in the log view".
 
In the introduction it says that this proposal is for error messages only and does not include Log or trace etc. However, in the issues section it talks about "Error message, error dialog, error in the console view, error in the log view".
 
--[[User:Daniel megert.ch.ibm.com|Daniel megert.ch.ibm.com]] 04:37, 28 September 2006 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Daniel megert.ch.ibm.com|Daniel megert.ch.ibm.com]] 04:37, 28 September 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
== StatusManager API - use interfaces ==
 +
 +
Is this really the API for the StatusManager?
 +
<pre>
 +
public void handle(IStatus status, int handlingHint, HashMap handlingProps);
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
Shouldn't it use <code>Map</code> instead?
 +
<pre>
 +
public void handle(IStatus status, int handlingHint, Map handlingProps);
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
--[[User:Nbeyer.cerner.com|Nbeyer.cerner.com]] 13:09, 16 January 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 13:09, 16 January 2007

In the introduction it says that this proposal is for error messages only and does not include Log or trace etc. However, in the issues section it talks about "Error message, error dialog, error in the console view, error in the log view". --Daniel megert.ch.ibm.com 04:37, 28 September 2006 (EDT)

StatusManager API - use interfaces

Is this really the API for the StatusManager?

public void handle(IStatus status, int handlingHint, HashMap handlingProps);

Shouldn't it use Map instead?

public void handle(IStatus status, int handlingHint, Map handlingProps);

--Nbeyer.cerner.com 13:09, 16 January 2007 (EST)