Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Planning Council/June 03 2015"

(Notes from Nick Boldt re: possible new simrel release strategy)
(No difference)

Revision as of 11:54, 3 June 2015

Notes from Nickboldt.gmail.com (talk) 12:54, 3 June 2015 (EDT) taken during the call, re: new simrel release strategy:

  • 3-month fixed cadence. Perhaps doing a major R0 in May, then 3 backwards-compatible maintenance releases: MR1 in Aug, MR2 in Nov, MR3 in Feb. Upgrade should be 100% possible within the simrel.
  • Projects can (continue to) join the simrel at any time, rather than ONLY getting on the train before M5 (March) of the R0 (June). I personally think the notion of declaring intent 3 months before a release date still makes sense, as it gives time to do IPzilla review, etc.
  • Should +0 and +1 projects have the restrictions on them from an API / UI perspective be the same as +2 and +3 projects? How would you police that?
  • Could we have auditing tools to check for projects who are on the train but miss a couple milestones or change their BREE requirement unexpectedly (eg., Sapphire 9.0.0.x) ?

Back to the top