Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:EclipseLink/UserGuide/JPA/Advanced JPA Development/Schema Generation/Index"

(New page: Questions about the current draft (1/31/11): [1] Can someone provide a code example, please? [2] Please also carefully review the Attributes table for accuracy and completeness. I tried ...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[2]
 
[2]
 
Please also carefully review the Attributes table for accuracy and completeness. I tried to consolidate the information from the Javadoc and the spec (http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/DesignDocs/283430), and I want to make sure it is correct.
 
Please also carefully review the Attributes table for accuracy and completeness. I tried to consolidate the information from the Javadoc and the spec (http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/DesignDocs/283430), and I want to make sure it is correct.
 +
 +
 +
Format seems different than @CascadeOnDelete and other annotations, these should only follow a consistent format, i.e. name, desc, example, etc.
 +
* some are titled "@CascadeOnDelete" others use both annotation and XML "@CascadeOnDelete and <cascade-on-delete>"
 +
* some include the source code to the annotation (why?) others do not
 +
* most include a attribute table of the attributes for the annotation
 +
* most provide an annotation example, but none seem to give an xml example (we should either give xml for all or none)
 +
* for example most seem to use the "span" not a "===" header
 +
* none provide an "Configuration File" header, so should not provide this unless you intend to update all of them?
 +
:[[User:James.sutherland.oracle.com|James.sutherland.oracle.com]] 19:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:53, 1 February 2011

Questions about the current draft (1/31/11):

[1] Can someone provide a code example, please?

[2] Please also carefully review the Attributes table for accuracy and completeness. I tried to consolidate the information from the Javadoc and the spec (http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/DesignDocs/283430), and I want to make sure it is correct.


Format seems different than @CascadeOnDelete and other annotations, these should only follow a consistent format, i.e. name, desc, example, etc.

  • some are titled "@CascadeOnDelete" others use both annotation and XML "@CascadeOnDelete and <cascade-on-delete>"
  • some include the source code to the annotation (why?) others do not
  • most include a attribute table of the attributes for the annotation
  • most provide an annotation example, but none seem to give an xml example (we should either give xml for all or none)
  • for example most seem to use the "span" not a "===" header
  • none provide an "Configuration File" header, so should not provide this unless you intend to update all of them?
James.sutherland.oracle.com 19:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Back to the top