Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:EclipseLink/DesignDocs/214519"
(→ELTable) |
(→@ELTable?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | == | + | == Naming & Annotations? == |
--[[User:Douglas.clarke.oracle.com|Doug]] 13:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Douglas.clarke.oracle.com|Doug]] 13:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | A couple of comments: | |
| − | + | # eclipselink.ddl.default-table-suffix: is it really a table suffix? That name implies to me additional text added to the table name. Its really a suffix added to CREATE TABLE command | |
| − | + | # @ELTable annotation? I do not like duplicated @Table in @ELTable | |
| − | + | #* Do we even need an annotation? Is PU property and eclipselink-orm.xml enough? | |
| − | + | ||
| − | * | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 10:06, 5 October 2010
Everything in @ELTable should be optional and the contents should override that of @Table.
What about a calling the annotation @TableExt (Ext for extension) or @TableOverrides or something else?
Gordon Yorke 13:58, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Naming & Annotations?
--Doug 13:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
A couple of comments:
- eclipselink.ddl.default-table-suffix: is it really a table suffix? That name implies to me additional text added to the table name. Its really a suffix added to CREATE TABLE command
- @ELTable annotation? I do not like duplicated @Table in @ELTable
- Do we even need an annotation? Is PU property and eclipselink-orm.xml enough?