Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:COSMOS Design 216529

Paul Stratton 29th Jan, 2008.

Jimmy, some updates and comments

1) Cosmos Dev process link included.

2) Are QA responsible for moving the ER from FIXED to VERIFIED ? If so this is an update to the Cosmos Dev process and this doc. If not then is there some signoff fr4om QA ?

3) The Platforms/Operating systems version (and all other dependencies )to be tested should be stated explicitely or provided via a link to the COSMOS M2 Dependencies.These should be the minimum versions for full testing. Sanity testing can then be performed for current GA versions of the dependencies - I added a couple of points to the relevent section.

4) QA should be responsible for checking the the test results to CVS ? Would need comitter status. This doc needs to specify how/what test results are submitted.

5) There should be some physical registering that QA are done with the iteration to avoid any misunderstandings with emails.


David whiteman.us.ibm.com 14:29, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Paul, re: #2 above, I don't know if this is documented anywhere, but in i8 we certainly followed the practice where QA is supposed to move ERs from FIXED to VERIFIED and in the case of regular defects it is whoever opened the defect that must verify it. We did have the problem in i8 where Shivy was only able to change to VERIFIED status if she opened the ER/defect, so I need to check with Mark to see if this restriction can be relaxed.

Re: #4, agreed. If there is no committer status, than QA should probably give test results to subproject leads for checkin.

Back to the top