Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:COSMOS Design 204959"

Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
[Sheldon's comment]  I assume the apis will throw some sort of exception.  For example if a user specifies a data provider that is not supported by the handler it should throw some sort of unsupported exception.
 
[Sheldon's comment]  I assume the apis will throw some sort of exception.  For example if a user specifies a data provider that is not supported by the handler it should throw some sort of unsupported exception.
 +
 +
[Valentina's comment]  I still have a hard time mapping the SML repository notion used here to its real meaning. Reading the document content it seems that SML repository in this context is the set of java API’s implemented in COSMOS which allows generic interaction with any repository containing SML compliant data ( or generic SML model ). In this context, SML repository is NOT the COSMOS SML repository we also call Data Center repository. If I got it right I suggest changing the name to 'API for generic SML models' or something similar.

Revision as of 16:08, 12 October 2007

This page includes all the discussion for COSMOS Design 204959.

[Sheldon's comment] I assume the apis will throw some sort of exception. For example if a user specifies a data provider that is not supported by the handler it should throw some sort of unsupported exception.

[Valentina's comment] I still have a hard time mapping the SML repository notion used here to its real meaning. Reading the document content it seems that SML repository in this context is the set of java API’s implemented in COSMOS which allows generic interaction with any repository containing SML compliant data ( or generic SML model ). In this context, SML repository is NOT the COSMOS SML repository we also call Data Center repository. If I got it right I suggest changing the name to 'API for generic SML models' or something similar.

Back to the top