Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "TPTP Sandbox"

m (TPTP Sandbox)
m (Feel free to add new items to this page)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
*Line level coverage and Emma
 
*Line level coverage and Emma
**The line level coverage offered as a technical preview in TPTP is using the Probekit runtime to collect data. Although the probekit offers a range of powerful functionalities, such as remote coverage, there are a few shortcomings that needs to be resolved
+
**The line level coverage offered as a technical preview in TPTP is using TPTP Probekit runtime to instrument the application and collect the required data. Although Probekit offers a range of powerful functionalities, such as remote coverage, there are a few shortcomings that needs to be resolved
***probekit is using JVMPI ( and planned to use JVMTI for java 5+ ). As a result the application should be run in profiling mode in order to collect line coverage
+
***Probekit is using JVMPI ( and planned to use JVMTI for java 5+ ). As a result the application should be run in profiling mode in order to collect line coverage
***the Agent Controller or IAC is required even when running locally
+
***Agent Controller or IAC is required even when running locally
 
**A proposed solution is to replace the probekit runtime for running line coverage with the Emma project. More investigation is required to understand the implications.
 
**A proposed solution is to replace the probekit runtime for running line coverage with the Emma project. More investigation is required to understand the implications.

Revision as of 13:24, 22 February 2007

Feel free to add new items to this page

  • Line level coverage and Emma
    • The line level coverage offered as a technical preview in TPTP is using TPTP Probekit runtime to instrument the application and collect the required data. Although Probekit offers a range of powerful functionalities, such as remote coverage, there are a few shortcomings that needs to be resolved
      • Probekit is using JVMPI ( and planned to use JVMTI for java 5+ ). As a result the application should be run in profiling mode in order to collect line coverage
      • Agent Controller or IAC is required even when running locally
    • A proposed solution is to replace the probekit runtime for running line coverage with the Emma project. More investigation is required to understand the implications.

Back to the top