Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "TPTP-PMC-20081112"

(Logistics)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Any new agenda items?
 
Any new agenda items?
 
* no
 
* no
 +
 +
== 4.5.2 Discussion ==
 +
 +
Currently bug fixing.
 +
 +
Note to everyone:  The next test pass starts November 26
  
 
== EclipseCon ==
 
== EclipseCon ==
Line 39: Line 45:
 
* They had an interesting discussion around the culture of Eclipse and how to balance community and productization.
 
* They had an interesting discussion around the culture of Eclipse and how to balance community and productization.
  
There is another potential contributor with similar questions
+
There is another potential contributo with similar questions
 +
discussion:
 +
* Paul and Oliver had a call with Fanfare Software.
 +
* Wanted more information about the Eclipse culture/processes and history/architecture of Hyades/TPTP
 +
* No TPTP (IBM/Intel) resources available
 +
* Interested in ASF (Paul sent documentation links)
  
 
Regarding the Mac/OS discussion from last week.
 
Regarding the Mac/OS discussion from last week.

Latest revision as of 11:51, 26 November 2008

Logistics

Attending: Eugene, Paul, Joanna, Oliver, Harm, Chris

  • Chris was late :-(

Any issues with last week's summary?

  • no

Any new agenda items?

  • no

4.5.2 Discussion

Currently bug fixing.

Note to everyone: The next test pass starts November 26

EclipseCon

Oliver asked Eugene how many test/performance submissions there have been so far?

  • None thusfar

Oliver asks if we think the pipeline will fill by the deadline on 24th

  • Team reiterated more of the talk ideas
  • IBM discussed maybe getting Jonathan involved in the discussion.

Oliver asked if we have any history on submission rates?

  • Eugene noted that overall Eclipsecon submission activity was low first week has been increasing
    • So far just 20-30
  • Paul noted that last year submissions didn't really start happening until fairly late in cycle.

Profiler outreach

Oliver asks if we have users yet for profiler outreach

  • Eugene mentioned that 4 folks have thusfar shown interest and he has answered some of their initial questions
    • 1 question about mac/os.
  • The other 3 users are actually trying it out now.
    • If we don't get feedback next week, Oliver may follow up.

Today Paul was fighting issues with some performance issues with a Java component.

  • He used the JVMTI profiler and got it to work well with little effort.
  • He did experience a few hiccups with buttons not showing up but otherwise it worked fine.

Misc

Oliver filled team in a bit on discussion he had with JProbe guys.

  • They had an interesting discussion around the culture of Eclipse and how to balance community and productization.

There is another potential contributo with similar questions discussion:

  • Paul and Oliver had a call with Fanfare Software.
  • Wanted more information about the Eclipse culture/processes and history/architecture of Hyades/TPTP
  • No TPTP (IBM/Intel) resources available
  • Interested in ASF (Paul sent documentation links)

Regarding the Mac/OS discussion from last week.

  • IBM noted that they know of another engineer has been spending some time on MacOS for JVMTI profiling as well.
  • We discussed who should be assigned as the point of contact from TPTP for contributors particpating
    • Harm suggests communicating these decisions thru the Bugzilla because the Mac/OS bugzilla actually has a pretty wide readership and it will be a good way to notify folks and maybe get more interest.

Eugene noted that he has had some questions asked to him about the Eclipse Babble incubation project

  • If it is successful, it has potential to help with globalization efforts

Back to the top