Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "RT/meetings/PMC Minutes 130417"

< RT‎ | meetings
(New page: == Attendees == == Agenda ==)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Attendees ==
 
== Attendees ==
 
+
* Tom
 +
* Ian
 +
* Glyn
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
 +
* Discuss Panel
 +
 +
== Discuss Panel Note ==
 +
* OSGi Frameworks or not.  We talked about other runtime environments.  All in agreement that the charter needs to change to support runtime environments
 +
** Ian will take the first stab at updating charter.
 +
* Solid example needed
 +
** Hard to find an owner with strong business need
 +
** Pointed that pet shop runs on Virgo
 +
** There is toast but its gone stale and maybe too complicated or involved.  Not necessarily exemplary.
 +
** We need something like JDT.  Can RAP be used to provide the example?
 +
* Projects on the train vs. not on the train
 +
** EclipseLink on the train: why?
 +
*** because they have integrated tools
 +
*** Keep rhythm for for releasing stuff
 +
** RAP is similar - Tools for RAP
 +
** Virgo
 +
*** no tooling integration
 +
*** no strong value add
 +
** Did not discuss the need for a common RT repo
 +
*** Would have been nice too!
 +
* Packaging Project
 +
** Not enough interest from contributors to drive the work?
 +
* Three stacks were discussed.  We should highlight these as the starting point for folks coming to RT.  Which stack should they use and why.
 +
** Vert.x - ??
 +
** Virgo  - Point to an easy starting guide for Nano
 +
** Jetty - Point to instructions for running stand alone or in OSGi

Latest revision as of 09:30, 17 April 2013

Attendees

  • Tom
  • Ian
  • Glyn

Agenda

  • Discuss Panel

Discuss Panel Note

  • OSGi Frameworks or not. We talked about other runtime environments. All in agreement that the charter needs to change to support runtime environments
    • Ian will take the first stab at updating charter.
  • Solid example needed
    • Hard to find an owner with strong business need
    • Pointed that pet shop runs on Virgo
    • There is toast but its gone stale and maybe too complicated or involved. Not necessarily exemplary.
    • We need something like JDT. Can RAP be used to provide the example?
  • Projects on the train vs. not on the train
    • EclipseLink on the train: why?
      • because they have integrated tools
      • Keep rhythm for for releasing stuff
    • RAP is similar - Tools for RAP
    • Virgo
      • no tooling integration
      • no strong value add
    • Did not discuss the need for a common RT repo
      • Would have been nice too!
  • Packaging Project
    • Not enough interest from contributors to drive the work?
  • Three stacks were discussed. We should highlight these as the starting point for folks coming to RT. Which stack should they use and why.
    • Vert.x - ??
    • Virgo - Point to an easy starting guide for Nano
    • Jetty - Point to instructions for running stand alone or in OSGi

Back to the top