Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "RT/meetings/PMC Minutes 110420"

< RT‎ | meetings
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
* Jeff
 
* Jeff
 +
* Tom
 +
* Glyn
 +
* Jesse
 +
* Christian
 +
* Peter K
 +
* Mike K
  
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
Line 8: Line 14:
 
* Gemini and Virgo on the release train
 
* Gemini and Virgo on the release train
 
* RTP "Enterprise" package
 
* RTP "Enterprise" package
 +
* OSGi TCKs and certification
 +
 +
== Discussion ==
 +
 +
===OSGi TCKs===
 +
* Various projects provide RIs for OSGi specs
 +
* we don't really coordinate "certification"
 +
* we should promote Eclipse implementations as certified
 +
* Tom will follow up with OSGi and EMO
 +
 +
===RT projects on the release train===
 +
* Lots of discussion around the merits and costs
 +
* In the end if it was really easy, people would just do it
 +
* So the question is, what are the hard parts.
 +
* Glyn pointed out that "must" occurs 51 times in the release train doc
 +
* A quick review shows that the vast majority of those however are trivial or already required for releases
 +
* Jesse suggested that we all review and point out "must"s that ''may'' be non-trivial.  This list is to be taking up in the next call
 +
 +
=== RTP Enterprise package ===
 +
* ran out of time to discuss in depth, deferring to next call.

Latest revision as of 10:05, 20 April 2011

Attendees

  • Jeff
  • Tom
  • Glyn
  • Jesse
  • Christian
  • Peter K
  • Mike K

Agenda

  • OSGi Alliance "product" pages
  • Gemini and Virgo on the release train
  • RTP "Enterprise" package
  • OSGi TCKs and certification

Discussion

OSGi TCKs

  • Various projects provide RIs for OSGi specs
  • we don't really coordinate "certification"
  • we should promote Eclipse implementations as certified
  • Tom will follow up with OSGi and EMO

RT projects on the release train

  • Lots of discussion around the merits and costs
  • In the end if it was really easy, people would just do it
  • So the question is, what are the hard parts.
  • Glyn pointed out that "must" occurs 51 times in the release train doc
  • A quick review shows that the vast majority of those however are trivial or already required for releases
  • Jesse suggested that we all review and point out "must"s that may be non-trivial. This list is to be taking up in the next call

RTP Enterprise package

  • ran out of time to discuss in depth, deferring to next call.

Back to the top