Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "RMF/Teaching"

< RMF
(Interested Parties)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Requirements Management and Engineering (RE&M) is taught, both in industry and academia.  Lately (mid 2014), I got more and more inquiries with respect to teaching RE&M as the underlying tool for exercises, projects and examples.  Therefore, I am trying to get interested parties together for this purpose.
 
Requirements Management and Engineering (RE&M) is taught, both in industry and academia.  Lately (mid 2014), I got more and more inquiries with respect to teaching RE&M as the underlying tool for exercises, projects and examples.  Therefore, I am trying to get interested parties together for this purpose.
  
As a starting point, this page acts to collect information about this initiative, starting with interested partyIf we pick up momentum, we can continue to use this wiki or migrate to a more appropriate platform.
+
== Join the Discussion ==
 +
 
 +
This discussion was initiated via email - a bad place to keep a conversation goingFor the time being, we will start a new discussion thread on LinkedIn.
 +
 
 +
== Systems Engineering or Requirements Engineering? ==
 +
 
 +
A number of participants pointed out that RE as a stand-alone discipline is losing importance in favor of Systems Engineering, of which RE is a sub-discipline.  Therefore, at a minimum we should look into RE in the context of overall SE.
 +
 
 +
== Concrete Ideas ==
 +
 
 +
Gael - project
 +
 
 +
Michael - book
  
 
== Interested Parties ==
 
== Interested Parties ==

Revision as of 07:35, 3 July 2014

Requirements Management and Engineering (RE&M) is taught, both in industry and academia. Lately (mid 2014), I got more and more inquiries with respect to teaching RE&M as the underlying tool for exercises, projects and examples. Therefore, I am trying to get interested parties together for this purpose.

Join the Discussion

This discussion was initiated via email - a bad place to keep a conversation going. For the time being, we will start a new discussion thread on LinkedIn.

Systems Engineering or Requirements Engineering?

A number of participants pointed out that RE as a stand-alone discipline is losing importance in favor of Systems Engineering, of which RE is a sub-discipline. Therefore, at a minimum we should look into RE in the context of overall SE.

Concrete Ideas

Gael - project

Michael - book

Interested Parties

  • Formal Mind GmbH (Michael Jastram)
  • Herrmann & Ehrlich (Andrea Herrmann)[1]

Contact / Initiator

Michael Jastram

Back to the top