Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Platform UI Design Discussion"

(Separation of Concerns)
(Discussion Areas)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* fixing the broken minimize
 
* fixing the broken minimize
 
* fast views, multiple fast view bars
 
* fast views, multiple fast view bars
 +
* MarkersViews [[Platform_UI_MarkersView]]
  
 
= Use Cases =
 
= Use Cases =

Revision as of 15:14, 10 July 2007

A discussion about generalizing and simplifying core Workbench concepts.

Discussion Areas

  • grouping
  • appearance
  • connections
  • nesting
  • fixing the broken minimize
  • fast views, multiple fast view bars
  • MarkersViews Platform_UI_MarkersView

Use Cases

  • Debugging client and server at the same time (each with its own Debug view, Variables view, etc)
  • Maximizing the editor area, not just one editor
  • Easily minimize everything except the editor area and the outline view
  • Define an eclipse presentation suitable for a Cell Phone (ensures presentation generality)

Separation of Concerns

Overall it seems that there are two concerns that we would like to separate:

  • How are the pieces that make up the workbench (window, views, editors, trim, ...) composed, and how are they connected?
    For this, we focus on questions like:
    • Which services (selection, key binding, etc.) does a piece need, and where does it get it from?
      • Menus - programmatically through the site and IActionBars
      • Context menus - programmatically through the site and IActionBars
      • Toolbar items - programmitcally through the site and IActionBars
      • Command handlers - programmatically through the site and IHandlerService
      • Selection service - programmatically through the site and/or workbench page/window
      • Part service - programmatically through the workbench page/window
      • Keybindings (sorta) - programmatically through the site and IBindingService (or the old IKeybindingService)
    • What does a piece (mostly: view, editor) contribute in terms of menus, toolbar items, context menu, trim items?
    • etc
  • How are the pieces presented, using a common layout, based on policy decisions for their placement?
    Here we answer questions like:
    • Where in the UI do the pieces show up? Where do contributed items show up?
    • Which pieces can be rearranged and moved by the user, and in which way?
      • CoolBar:
        • Rearrange groups by dragging (within the CoolBar only)
      • Perspective Switcher:
        • Location can be changed using the "Dock On" entry in its context menu
        • Drag the perspective entries to rearrange them
        • Drag an entry outside the workbench window to create a new window showing that perspective
      • Trim:
        • Drag the trim element to any trim area
      • View Stacks:
        • Drag a view/stack to another stack to merge the two
        • Drag a view a 'new' site to create a new stack containing the view (dragging a view stack this way is a rearrangement since the old stack will disappear once all the views have been moved to the new one).
        • Drag a view/stack outside the workbench to create a Detached Window (only on platforms that support reparenting)
        • Drag a view/stack to the Fast View Bar (FVB) to make all the views in the stack fast views The entries are added at the drop insertion point (i.e. you can drop between two existing icons in the FVB)
        • Drag a single view icon within the FVB to rearrange. Dragging outside the FVB acts like any other view drag

Things like menus, context menus, and toolbar items are also contributed declaratively through:

  • org.eclipse.ui.actionSets
  • org.eclipse.ui.editorActions
  • org.eclipse.ui.viewActions
  • org.eclipse.ui.popupMenus

Thoughts

Eventually, we need a story for getting back the old behaviour. Let's not worry about that too much for now.

Why does trim not show up in the class hierarchy for views and editors, e.g. as in:

Piece
 Trim
 Part
  View
  Editor

Implement 'Minimized View Bar' support? These would be slightly different in that selecting a view from the bar would restore that part site for the view (or its stack?) and that this would stay until the bar was used again to 'collapse' it (as opposed to the more immediate mode of fast views).

Are these simply new PartSites for a ViewStack? If so and we can also that the Fast View Bar is a PartSite then we may be able to simplify some of the current issues in the presentation layer as well since both Fast Views and DetachedWindows are currently treated as 'special' elements in the structure.

Implement 'auto minimize bars' It would be possible to convert existing view stacks into 'Minimize View bars' in the trim when the editor (EditorArea?) is maximized.

Should we integrate the View/Stack dragging capability to extend to dragging a View/Stack directly into the trim areas (as we now support for Fast View Bar)? Dropping into the Trim Area would create a 'Minimized View Bar' as described above.

Should the maximize for editors apply to the editor specifically or to the EditorArea as a whole? There's some merit in the latter because you cannot currently use this functionality to see two ediors at once (folks using tiled editors are even more likely to want to maximize since eash editor gets less screen real estate).

We should look at the persistence life-cycle. Currently we're in a state where the trim order gets read and applied after we've already loaded and arranged the trim in its default location. This is clearly non-optimal and leaves us open to flashing etc. Ensuring that all cached info is read and used during the workbench's initial construction might be better.