Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Planning Council/June 03 2009"
(6/3) |
(→Attendees) |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|Chris Aniszczyk || | |Chris Aniszczyk || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Cedric Brun || | + | |Cedric Brun || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Oliver Cole || | |Oliver Cole || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Stefan Daume || | + | |Stefan Daume || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Brian Fitzpatrick || | + | |Brian Fitzpatrick || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Wayne Beaton || | |Wayne Beaton || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Doug Gaff || | + | |Doug Gaff || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Neil Hauge || | |Neil Hauge || | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|Mika Hoikkala || | |Mika Hoikkala || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Anthony Hunter || | + | |Anthony Hunter || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Oisin Hurley || | + | |Oisin Hurley || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Markus Knauer || | + | |Markus Knauer || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Christian Kurzke || | |Christian Kurzke || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Gary Xue || | + | |Gary Xue || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Ed Merks || | + | |Ed Merks || Y |
|- | |- | ||
|Mike Milinkovich || | |Mike Milinkovich || | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|Kaloyan Raev || R | |Kaloyan Raev || R | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Thomas Watson || | + | |Thomas Watson || Y |
|- | |- | ||
− | |David Williams || | + | |David Williams || Y |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Andreas Buchen (SAP/MAT) || Y | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 66: | Line 68: | ||
* Its official: '''Helios''' is name of our 2010 Simultaneous Release. | * Its official: '''Helios''' is name of our 2010 Simultaneous Release. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Please be sure you read and execute [[Galileo/Final_Daze]]. | ||
* PC Decision on Categories in Discovery Site | * PC Decision on Categories in Discovery Site | ||
Line 72: | Line 76: | ||
::: PC didn't like the exact proposal. Will comment in bug, and await reply. No reply?! | ::: PC didn't like the exact proposal. Will comment in bug, and await reply. No reply?! | ||
+ | ::: Doug to follow up with Martin, but we'll look to move "remote access" to "tools and goodies" category, so this category can be more meaningfully named. | ||
:: RAP in Webtools? No bug opened? | :: RAP in Webtools? No bug opened? | ||
+ | :::Markus to followup with RAP team (to have them open a cross-project bug). | ||
+ | :::(Markus - 20090604: There is a bug open in "Simultaneous Release": [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=278416 bug 278416]) | ||
* Review [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php project status] and determine actions to take. | * Review [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php project status] and determine actions to take. | ||
− | :: | + | :: We should take a position on release or no release. |
:: Judging from items not marked, it appears these are the projects of worst quality (or, worst adopter readiness?): | :: Judging from items not marked, it appears these are the projects of worst quality (or, worst adopter readiness?): | ||
+ | :: These should be 'resolved' one way or the other ... fixed, if fixed, won't fix and document why not. | ||
− | |||
:::PDT 15 | :::PDT 15 | ||
− | :::CDT | + | :::CDT 12 |
− | :::MAT | + | :::MAT 11 |
− | ::: | + | |
+ | ::: Andreas to work on MAT items bookkeeping | ||
+ | ::: David to contact Roy and Doug | ||
+ | |||
+ | * PC review/approval of exceptions | ||
+ | : commonj.sdo jar not signed "for technical reasons" [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277331 bug 277331] | ||
+ | : capabilities not defined as PC requested [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=254130#c9 but 254130] | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: no objections | ||
* RC3 update | * RC3 update | ||
:: Done yet? | :: Done yet? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Proposed Helios Plan Dates: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: These are rough, quick dates, just taken from last year (and adjust to closest Friday and similar) | ||
+ | :: Still need to go through calendar, see if adjustments needed for Holidays, EclipseCon, etc. | ||
+ | :: PC Reps should start to discuss these dates with their groups, and see if they will commit to participating from the beginning ... from M1! | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: M1 8/7 - 8/21 | ||
+ | :: M2 9/18 - 10/2 | ||
+ | :: Initial standard-format plans due 10/2 | ||
+ | :: M3 10/30 - 11/13 | ||
+ | :: M4 12/11 - 12/18 [note: beginning of 1 week windows] | ||
+ | :: M5 1/29 - 2/5 | ||
+ | :: M6 3/12 - 3/19 | ||
+ | :: M7 4/30 - 5/7 | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Release: 6/30/2010 (last Wednesday of June) | ||
+ | |||
* Next Meeting | * Next Meeting | ||
− | :: | + | :June 17, Wednesday -- last minute issues? Conduct process "postmortem". |
+ | |||
+ | :July 1, Wednesday -- no meeting. Celebrate/rest after release. Plus, holiday week in US. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :August 5, Wednesday -- Helios! | ||
+ | |||
+ | :September 2, Wednesday | ||
:: Upcoming topics | :: Upcoming topics | ||
:::Frequency and dates of maintenance builds | :::Frequency and dates of maintenance builds | ||
:::Dates for next year's project plans | :::Dates for next year's project plans | ||
− | |||
:::Build schedule for next year (start with M1) | :::Build schedule for next year (start with M1) | ||
==Reference == | ==Reference == | ||
− | * PC Position on off-cycle releases and use of discovery site (and EPP)? This came up in discussions about a Pulsar package. | + | * from previous meeting: PC Position on off-cycle releases and use of discovery site (and EPP)? This came up in discussions about a Pulsar package. |
:: Conclusion: we do not want to support off-cycle releases. But with following compromise: If a project still met all the normal "release criteria" set forth as must-do's by PC then they could introduce something new during SR1 or SR2 (that is SR1 and SR2 can have more than service, if important, and must-do criteria met). The reason for not supporting things off cycle was a. it is more work to support it, b. there is no opportunity for "simultaneous release" testing, c. it would dilute the meaning of "simultaneous release". | :: Conclusion: we do not want to support off-cycle releases. But with following compromise: If a project still met all the normal "release criteria" set forth as must-do's by PC then they could introduce something new during SR1 or SR2 (that is SR1 and SR2 can have more than service, if important, and must-do criteria met). The reason for not supporting things off cycle was a. it is more work to support it, b. there is no opportunity for "simultaneous release" testing, c. it would dilute the meaning of "simultaneous release". |
Latest revision as of 05:10, 24 August 2009
Contents
Logistics
Meeting Title: | Planning Council Conference Call |
Date & Time: | Wednesday, June 03, 2009, at 1600 UTC / 0900 SFO / 1200 NYC / 1700 London / 1800 Berlin |
Dial-in: | For the call-in numbers, see the "Project Review" number on Foundation Portal page. |
Attendees
Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record. Topics
Reference
Simultaneous_Release_Roles and Simultaneous_Release_Roles/EMO |