Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Planning Council/December 11 2013"
m (David williams.us.ibm.com moved page Planning Council/December 4 2013 to Planning Council/December 11 2013: change title to match day of meeting) |
m (Add item re bug 423734) |
||
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
: Do we formally approve requirements for Luna? | : Do we formally approve requirements for Luna? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Anyone concerned about EPP's plans to require Java 7? | ||
| + | |||
| + | : See {{bug|423734}}. Don't we usually encourage (but not require) projects to support the same "Target Environments" as the [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/development/plans/eclipse_project_plan_4_4.xml#target_environments Eclipse Platform Plan]? | ||
== Progress on Action Items == | == Progress on Action Items == | ||
Revision as of 11:12, 11 December 2013
Contents
Logistics
| Meeting Title: | Planning Council Conference Call |
| Date & Time: | Wednesday, December 4, 2013, at 1200 Noon Eastern |
| Dial in: | (See Asterisk service for complete details on SIP, potential new numbers, phone mute commands, etc.)
Phone Numbers: (Check Asterisk/Numbers for more or current phone numbers.)
|
Members and Attendees
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: "Inactive" refers to Strategic Members or PMCs we have not heard from for a while, and have been unable to convince to participate. Those members can become active again at any time. Contact David Williams if questions.
Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record.
Y = Yes, attended
N = No, did not
R = regrets sent ahead of time
D = delegated
X = not expected
Announcements
- Have started the "Luna+1" naming process (See bug 422883). Thanks Chris, for taking the initiative.
Kepler SR2
- ?
Luna Planning
- Review Policy Wording
- After our last meeting, I realized we had never incorporated "Doug's wording" about new features in SRs into the actual Policy FAQ (though we discussed and agreed, though left open a month in case strategic members needed to discuss internally). I have now incorporated the wording in the FAQ. See SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Policy_FAQ, the note that starts "[added April, 2013, modified November 2013]".
- Please review to make sure I've correctly captured what we discussed -- and then "we" will announce on cross-project list.
- Any new requirements? Any to remove or change?
- If we ask people to specify exact feature (or repository) versions in b3 aggregator files (see bug 419746) is that a new "requirement" or implementation detail? For some, it would require "more work" and/or better tools to generate the files more easily.
- Do we formally approve requirements for Luna?
- Anyone concerned about EPP's plans to require Java 7?
- See bug 423734. Don't we usually encourage (but not require) projects to support the same "Target Environments" as the Eclipse Platform Plan?
Progress on Action Items
- GSoC project for "Development Channel"? (Wayne)
- While GSoC is over, for a year, Wayne will at least recall history and open a bug for this..
- Improved "aggregator examples/doc". (dw -- no progress).
- [Orbit plan (dw -- no formal progress)]
- Complete Google Calendar. (dw)
- Compute Luna SR dates. (dw)
Next Meeting
- No meeting in January? Or move to "second Wednesday" (January 8, 2014)
- February 5, 2014 - Regular First Wednesday Meeting
Reference
- EclipseCon face-to-face follow-through action items. For original meeting notes, see Planning_Council/March_24_2013 and for discussion leading to action items, see Planning_Council/April_10_2013. For last status update, see Planning_Council/May_8_2013.