Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "PDE UI Incubator ApiTools Compare Dev"

(Links)
(Technology)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
== Technology ==
 
== Technology ==
 +
 +
[[Image:ApiToolsProcess.JPG|center]]
  
 
Major points:
 
Major points:
Line 57: Line 59:
 
The classes SnapshotOperationsBundle and SnapshotOperations from the "core" bundle provide access points for the UI and headless invocations. The information on the source code to be processed and processing options is passed via IApiControl structure.
 
The classes SnapshotOperationsBundle and SnapshotOperations from the "core" bundle provide access points for the UI and headless invocations. The information on the source code to be processed and processing options is passed via IApiControl structure.
  
Source code is described via IApiContainer structures that could be used to represent individual OSGi bundles, Java JARs or directories that contain source code. See classes SourceContainerBundle and SourceContainer.
+
The "core" bundle contains specialized parser for .class files that allows us to extract only information needed by API tools. As the parser bypasses most of the information in the .class files, parsing is rather efficient.
 +
 
 +
'''Creating API snapshot'''
 +
 
 +
From the view point of the tool, the source code it is processing is organized in containers (IApiContainer). Containers have a unique string ID, version, and location. ID and version are persisted in the repository when information is written out; location only there while API collection takes place. IApiContainer structures that could be used to represent individual OSGi bundles, Java JARs or directories that contain source code. See classes SourceContainerBundle and SourceContainer.
  
 
The bundle version uses information contained in the manifest.mf files. To obtain it, it relies on the internal PDEState helper class from PDE Core.
 
The bundle version uses information contained in the manifest.mf files. To obtain it, it relies on the internal PDEState helper class from PDE Core.
  
The "core" bundle contains specialized parser for .class files that allows us to extract only information needed by API tools. As the parser bypasses most of the information in the .class files, parsing is rather efficient.
+
Collector class takes a list of containers. It discovers all .class files in the containers and process them. For directories, all sub-directories are included. For bundles, re-exported bundles are included as if they were present in the container. The inclusion of re-exported process is done recursively.
  
The package "org.eclipse.pde.api.tools.internal.model" contains classes representing various Java constructs in memory (such as methods, fields, classes, and so on).
+
Collector processes all classes contained in containers in three steps:
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>inherited elements (methods and fields) from non-API classes are recursively merged into APIs</li>
 +
<li>non-API classes are identified and removed from the memory model</li>
 +
<li>memory model is cleaned up to remove information not visible in normal usage (members with default visibility, protected elements of final classes, non-API superclasses and interfaces).</li>
 +
</ul>
  
The two major operations – API snapshot collection and API comparison are performed, respectfully, by the Collector and Comparator classes.
+
Once the processing is done, in-memory model has no elements with default visibility. At this point "public" visibility flags are reset and all elements with non-specified visibility have public visibility. (This is done to simplify storage and comparison procedures.)
 +
 
 +
Classes in the package "org.eclipse.pde.api.tools.internal.model" used to store Java model read from .class files in memory.
 +
 
 +
Class ApiSnapshot contains all the information along with helper methods to simplify access to the containers. ApiContainer along with ID and version has a list of API classes and interfaces. All those classes have methods to support storage of contained information in XML format.
  
 
IApiRepository describes an interface to the repository for API snapshots. At present, it only implemented to allow snapshots be stored in a directory on a file system; however, as may other pieces, it is designed to be pluggable.
 
IApiRepository describes an interface to the repository for API snapshots. At present, it only implemented to allow snapshots be stored in a directory on a file system; however, as may other pieces, it is designed to be pluggable.
  
Results produced by Comparator are stored first as XML reports (see XMLReport class) and then converted into HTML using XSLT (see ComparisonHtmlReport). The approach taken so far is that XML reports are detailed reports; some details can be absent form HTML reports to improve readability.
+
'''Comparing API snapshots'''
 +
 
 +
Comparator class compares two API snapshots. Comparison is asymmetrical. To perform comparison, for each old classifier it attempts  to find a matching classifier in the new API snapshot. If no such match found, the classifier marked as "removed". (Similarly, new classifiers with no matches in old classifiers are marked as "added".)
 +
 
 +
If match is found, ApiElement diff(ApiElement newElement, DiffContext context) method is called. The method is present on all levels if API elements and is called recursively to produce ApiElement that contain only differences between "old" and "new" elements. Method will return null if no differences are found.
 +
 
 +
At each level differences are aggregated. For example, processing for the class will find class-specific differences (visibility, inheritance chain) and will include differences of methods and fields contained by the class.
 +
 
 +
If full processing is requested, comparison is run twice swapping "old" and "new" snapshots. The second pass is used to identify "added" non-breaking changed. Information on the current state comparison passed around in the DiffContext class.
 +
 
 +
The result of both comparisons are stored in the ApiComparisonResult which passed to report generation routines.
  
 +
The XML report generation utilizes ability of ApiElement’s create XML output. As ApiComparisonResult contains only elements that changed, writing it out produces ready (but hard to read) report on changes. To produce easy-to-read report, XSLT Ant task is used to convert XML report into HTML. The report/format.xslt file contains processing instruction and styles are stored in the report/style.css file (see ComparisonHtmlReport).
  
 
== Links ==
 
== Links ==

Latest revision as of 16:10, 31 August 2007

API Comparison Tool – Developer’s docs

Main functionality

The tool helps developers track API changes. It allows:

  • Detect binary incompatible changes
  • Create reports containing all changed (could be used as a base of “What’s New”)
  • Report incorrect bundle versions based on API changes

The tool takes a "source" and creates API snapshot from it. The tool use OSGi bundle(s), RCP product, or Java JAR(s) as a "source".

The snapshot is an XML file that is stored in the file system. Another version of the "source" can be compared to the snapshot to detect API changes.

For example, using this tool Eclipse SDK 3.2 can be compared to the version 3.3 to detect incompatible changes, produce skeletons for "what’s new" reports, and check to see if versions of bundles have been properly incremented.

Additional functionality

The tool supports "exclusion" mechanism that allows known problems to be omitted from the reports. The exclusion files follow the same format as XML API reports and, in fact, are expected to be produced from the reports by users.

The tool can be run both from Eclipse and in a headless mode.

Current status

The tool received a moderate amount of testing and is ready to be used.

Potential developments

At present directory on the file system as used as a repository for API snapshots. This approach is fine for a small workgroup, but something more scalable (like an SQL database) eventually will be needed to store API snapshots

The API description is being extracted from .class file. Alternatively, a module could be added to collect it from JDT model.

Fine-grained rules: A number of places in Eclipse have fine-grained API usage rules. Most common example would be API interfaces. A number of them has text in Javadoc declaring that users should not implement those interfaces. As such, adding methods to those interfaces is not a breaking change from Eclipse view point, but the tool has no way to detect such fine grained restrictions. A possible solution would be usage of new Javadoc tags to provide this information in a standard way.

Technology

ApiToolsProcess.JPG

Major points:

  • API information is extracted from .class files using custom parser
  • API/non-API determination is done based on OSGi manifest files
  • Detailed XML reports are produced
  • XSLT is used transform reports into readable HTML
  • System was designed in a modular fashion (source, repository, reports are replacable)

At present code is contained in 3 bundles:

  • org.eclipse.pde.api.tools – the "core" functionality
  • org.eclipse.pde.api.tools.ui – UI elements exposing "core" functionality
  • org.eclipse.pde.api.tools.tests – tests

The bundles contain code for both API comparison tool and reference extraction tool.

The classes SnapshotOperationsBundle and SnapshotOperations from the "core" bundle provide access points for the UI and headless invocations. The information on the source code to be processed and processing options is passed via IApiControl structure.

The "core" bundle contains specialized parser for .class files that allows us to extract only information needed by API tools. As the parser bypasses most of the information in the .class files, parsing is rather efficient.

Creating API snapshot

From the view point of the tool, the source code it is processing is organized in containers (IApiContainer). Containers have a unique string ID, version, and location. ID and version are persisted in the repository when information is written out; location only there while API collection takes place. IApiContainer structures that could be used to represent individual OSGi bundles, Java JARs or directories that contain source code. See classes SourceContainerBundle and SourceContainer.

The bundle version uses information contained in the manifest.mf files. To obtain it, it relies on the internal PDEState helper class from PDE Core.

Collector class takes a list of containers. It discovers all .class files in the containers and process them. For directories, all sub-directories are included. For bundles, re-exported bundles are included as if they were present in the container. The inclusion of re-exported process is done recursively.

Collector processes all classes contained in containers in three steps:

  • inherited elements (methods and fields) from non-API classes are recursively merged into APIs
  • non-API classes are identified and removed from the memory model
  • memory model is cleaned up to remove information not visible in normal usage (members with default visibility, protected elements of final classes, non-API superclasses and interfaces).

Once the processing is done, in-memory model has no elements with default visibility. At this point "public" visibility flags are reset and all elements with non-specified visibility have public visibility. (This is done to simplify storage and comparison procedures.)

Classes in the package "org.eclipse.pde.api.tools.internal.model" used to store Java model read from .class files in memory.

Class ApiSnapshot contains all the information along with helper methods to simplify access to the containers. ApiContainer along with ID and version has a list of API classes and interfaces. All those classes have methods to support storage of contained information in XML format.

IApiRepository describes an interface to the repository for API snapshots. At present, it only implemented to allow snapshots be stored in a directory on a file system; however, as may other pieces, it is designed to be pluggable.

Comparing API snapshots

Comparator class compares two API snapshots. Comparison is asymmetrical. To perform comparison, for each old classifier it attempts to find a matching classifier in the new API snapshot. If no such match found, the classifier marked as "removed". (Similarly, new classifiers with no matches in old classifiers are marked as "added".)

If match is found, ApiElement diff(ApiElement newElement, DiffContext context) method is called. The method is present on all levels if API elements and is called recursively to produce ApiElement that contain only differences between "old" and "new" elements. Method will return null if no differences are found.

At each level differences are aggregated. For example, processing for the class will find class-specific differences (visibility, inheritance chain) and will include differences of methods and fields contained by the class.

If full processing is requested, comparison is run twice swapping "old" and "new" snapshots. The second pass is used to identify "added" non-breaking changed. Information on the current state comparison passed around in the DiffContext class.

The result of both comparisons are stored in the ApiComparisonResult which passed to report generation routines.

The XML report generation utilizes ability of ApiElement’s create XML output. As ApiComparisonResult contains only elements that changed, writing it out produces ready (but hard to read) report on changes. To produce easy-to-read report, XSLT Ant task is used to convert XML report into HTML. The report/format.xslt file contains processing instruction and styles are stored in the report/style.css file (see ComparisonHtmlReport).

Links

API Tools

API Tool User Guide

API Tools Demo

PDE Incubator - New projects that might be incorporated into PDE in future.

Back to the top