Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Orbit Minutes 070724

Revision as of 13:48, 17 July 2007 by Dj houghton.ca.ibm.com (Talk | contribs) (New page: * Call convened at [http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=07&day=24&year=2007&hour=10&min=0&sec=0&p1=188 1000 EDT] * Client call setup: [Asterisk Conference Calls] * Conf ...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  • Call convened at 1000 EDT
  • Client call setup: [Asterisk Conference Calls]
  • Conf id: 8978
  • PIN: 82713
  • Back-up Call-in: 613.287.8000 or 866.362.7064, passcode 892048#
  • Previous Meeting: Orbit Minutes 070626

Attendees

  • TBD

Discussion

Tests

We have also added a basic test suite which verifies the layout of bundles.

  • some tests are currently fail because their manifest files aren't the right casing
  • people need to change manifest casing
  • Action: DJ to enter bug against PDE to validate the casing. (Done - bug 194650)
  • Action: DJ to gather bundles which are failing and will send note to mailing list.
  • We need to see if these are tested on Linux.


New Bundles

Now that we have declared a "recommended" build, is it ok to start releasing new bundles to Orbit?

  • remove for this week
  • add nightly builds? requires separate streams
  • R-builds are really a packaging problem?
  • build it from a status file?
  • Action: Chris to remove 2 new bundles from feature/map file until next week. (Done)

Conf Calls

The Eclipse Foundation has a new infrastructure for conference calls. We should start using it for Orbit calls.

  • Action: Jeff to co-ordinate and send note with new info.

Bundle downloads

Do we want to try and make the GET URLs generated by Orbit be build-independent? That is, not have the build id in it so consumers don't always have to update their map files if there is a new Orbit build and their bundle didn't change?

  • Action: DJ to write wiki describing problems.

Signing Bundles

There are some problems with signed bundles because not all teams sign. (and Orbit doesn't)

  • e.g. platform signs but wtp doesn't sign - same bundle, same qualifier
  • signing is not a requirement for Europa
  • orbit doesn't sign but always said we should
  • probably a couple days or a weeks worth of work to modify build scripts
  • Action: David to send a note to cross-project warning people of potential problems. (Done)
  • only happens when you have people unzipping on top of a signed version

R-builds

Discussions surrounding Orbit R-Builds.

  • when is the next r-build?
  • how do we plan for this?
  • same as regular project?
  • branch releng project to europa_maintenance
  • need to tag the map files for each build
  • do we really need branches?
  • create new map files? had because its based on what people consume
  • how about new features? set1 is for europa, something new for maintenance, etc.
  • thought from Pascal: have the build produce multiple map files, one for each consumer based on the info in the ip log file

Next Meeting

July 24, 2007 at 1000 EDT, Agenda: Orbit Minutes 070724

Back to the top