Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Modeling PMC Meeting, 2010-04-27"

(New page: Conference number: North America 1 866-842-3549, Global +800-4444-7070, Ottawa 613-787-5018, Passcode: 1556241 * International Toll-free number notes ** Dialing from a cellular network m...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
Time: 11:00AM Eastern - [http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2010&month=3&day=16&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=179&p2=37&p3=195&p4=224 See it in your time zone]
  
 
Conference number: North America 1 866-842-3549, Global +800-4444-7070, Ottawa 613-787-5018, Passcode: 1556241
 
Conference number: North America 1 866-842-3549, Global +800-4444-7070, Ottawa 613-787-5018, Passcode: 1556241
Line 4: Line 5:
 
* International Toll-free number notes
 
* International Toll-free number notes
 
** Dialing from a cellular network may not work!
 
** Dialing from a cellular network may not work!
** Passcode is often not recognized. After the third failure, you will be transferred to an operator who will ask for the conference ID (1556241), sponsoring company (IBM) and meeting organizer (Anthony Hunter).  
+
** Passcode is often not recognized. After the third failure, you will be transferred to an operator who will ask for the conference ID (1556241), sponsoring company (IBM) and meeting organizer (Paul Elder).  
 
** Pressing *0 will bring you directly to an operator.
 
** Pressing *0 will bring you directly to an operator.
  

Latest revision as of 09:35, 20 April 2010

Time: 11:00AM Eastern - See it in your time zone

Conference number: North America 1 866-842-3549, Global +800-4444-7070, Ottawa 613-787-5018, Passcode: 1556241

  • International Toll-free number notes
    • Dialing from a cellular network may not work!
    • Passcode is often not recognized. After the third failure, you will be transferred to an operator who will ask for the conference ID (1556241), sponsoring company (IBM) and meeting organizer (Paul Elder).
    • Pressing *0 will bring you directly to an operator.

Expected Attendees

  • Ed Merks
  • Sven Efftinge
  • Cedric Brun
  • Kenn Hussey
  • Frédéric Jouault
  • Jean Bezivin
  • Anthony Hunter
  • Artem Tikhomirov
  • Miles Parker
  • Yves Yang

Topics

  • GMF restructuring
    • GMF Restructure approved by the EMO April 20
    • Has Graphiti proposal been updated to reflect the restructuring? ( and to acknowledge that the GMF runtime too has an API, albeit one that leaks the GEF API through )
  • Project Moves
    • What is the status of the pending moves? What of other GMT subprojects?
    • Epsilon, MoDisco, and MOFScript
      • GMT will terminate after the parts that are active are moved.
      • Epsilon will move to EMFT
      • MoDisco will move to MDT
      • MOFScript should be moved to M2T; will forward the private discussions to the m2t-dev mailing list.
  • Helios Participation
    • Portal tracker - is it available yet?
      • Yes, it's apparently in place.
    • Do we have an "end game" plan and/or ramp-down policy in place for Modeling yet?
      • We could reuse last year's policy.
    • Obeo to look at helping promote Ecore Tools to Helios
  • Modeling Builds
    • Do we have momentum for all the modeling projects to move to *Buckminster*.
    • Lets get back to the days where all of modeling is using he same build technology (and we all can help each other).
      • Should all move to *Buckminster*.
  • Modeling Websites
    • All Modeling projects should use the same web structure
    • We need to apply the latest theme (like Xtext has?)
  • Update Sites
    • Do we need individual "roll-up" update sites for projects that are on the release train?
      • People are concerned about problems this causes if several projects try to publish at once.
      • It's better to aggregate/compose individual update sites.
      • Features should reference that.
      • Should it be one site for all of modeling?
  • Examples Features / Plug-ins
    • Do we need downloadable/updatable examples features and plug-ins anymore if we have an example installer in place?
      • Not totally resolved...
  • Capabilities
    • Still... we discussed this during a previous meeting, but not sure we've arrived at a consensus.
      • It's problematic to keep them separate and to keep them out of Helios.
      • It would be good for Amalgamation to provide good categorizations.
      • Need to discuss further.