Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "ModelingPlatform/July 28, Telephone Conference"

 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
# Yves Bontemps, SWIFT  
 
# Yves Bontemps, SWIFT  
 
# Christophe Gregoire, Alcatel-Lucent
 
# Christophe Gregoire, Alcatel-Lucent
 +
# Jean-Francois Decauwers, Alcatel-Lucent
 +
# Olivier Moises, Alcatel-Lucent
 
# Martin Mandischer, itemis AG  
 
# Martin Mandischer, itemis AG  
 
# Stephan Eberle, Geensys
 
# Stephan Eberle, Geensys
# Kenn Hussey, Zeligsoft
+
# Kenn Hussey, Cloudsmith
 
# Dominique Toupin, Ericsson
 
# Dominique Toupin, Ericsson
 
# Francis Bordeleau, Zeligsoft
 
# Francis Bordeleau, Zeligsoft
Line 14: Line 16:
 
# Eike Stepper, CDO
 
# Eike Stepper, CDO
 
# ??, Obeo
 
# ??, Obeo
# ??, Alcatel-Lucent
 
  
  

Latest revision as of 08:04, 29 July 2010

Modeling Working Group Telephone Conference July 28, 2010


Attendees:

  1. Robert Blust, UBS AG
  2. Yves Bontemps, SWIFT
  3. Christophe Gregoire, Alcatel-Lucent
  4. Jean-Francois Decauwers, Alcatel-Lucent
  5. Olivier Moises, Alcatel-Lucent
  6. Martin Mandischer, itemis AG
  7. Stephan Eberle, Geensys
  8. Kenn Hussey, Cloudsmith
  9. Dominique Toupin, Ericsson
  10. Francis Bordeleau, Zeligsoft
  11. Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
  12. Eike Stepper, CDO
  13.  ??, Obeo


Agenda Items:

1. Cooperation with Zeligsoft 2. Status: Architecture mapping and project identification 3. Status: Gap analysis 4. Next steps

  1. gap analysis
  2. Feedback on schedule for planning

Meeting:

1. Cooperation with Zeligsoft

Ian and Stephan explained the cooperation with Zeligsoft.

2. Status: Architecture mapping and project identification 3. Status: Gap analysis

Stephan elaborated on the progress of the gap analysis. He explained the requirement/architecture mapping and the identification of eclispe projecte, the dentification of detailed capabilities and first estimated for Xpand, Xtend and CDO. Stephan asked the user companies for feedback on priorities established on the level of detailed capabilities.

4. Next steps

  1. gap analysis

Martin proposed to have a joint study with zeligsoft. There were no objections

  1. Feedback on schedule for planning (Martin)

Martin asked for an agreement on a revised schedule. The MPIWG deliverable planned for the end of august was replaced by a bi-weekly update on the progress. This document update will be accompanied by a joint conference call. A joint gap analysis will be ready be the end of september. The roadmap which is based on the gap analysis will be delivered at the end of october. UBS, SWIFT, Alcatel-Lucent agreed upon this revised schedule.

Ian invited to the next conference call on August 18th.