Difference between revisions of "ModelingPlatform/EclipseConEuropeNov2 2011"

From Eclipsepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
*Pierre Gaufillet, Airbus
 
*Pierre Gaufillet, Airbus
 
*Stephan Eberle, itemis
 
*Stephan Eberle, itemis
*Eike Stepper, ES-Computersysteme
 
 
*Robert Blust, UBS AG
 
*Robert Blust, UBS AG
 
*Bran Selic, Malina Software
 
*Bran Selic, Malina Software
Line 35: Line 34:
 
'''Implementer Companies'''<br>
 
'''Implementer Companies'''<br>
 
What is the view of implementer companies, their core expertise, what implementation can have a big impact on open source modeling next year, low hanging fruit, what is their current initiatives, etc.
 
What is the view of implementer companies, their core expertise, what implementation can have a big impact on open source modeling next year, low hanging fruit, what is their current initiatives, etc.
*Eike Stepper, ES-Computersysteme: CDO update, main missing features, brand new design of ECP 2
 
 
*Stephan Eberle, itemis update, initiatives for next year
 
*Stephan Eberle, itemis update, initiatives for next year
  

Revision as of 02:22, 2 November 2011

Eclipse Modeling Ecosystem Face to Face Meeting at EclipseCon Europe

9h00 - 12h00, Wednesday November 2, 2011

Conference room Herzog Eberhard Ludwig at the Nestor Hotel, Ludwigsburg, Germany


Attendees

  • Dominique Toupin, Ericsson
  • Gaël Blondelle, Obeo
  • Pierre Gaufillet, Airbus
  • Stephan Eberle, itemis
  • Robert Blust, UBS AG
  • Bran Selic, Malina Software
  • Martin Flügge, MFTechnologies
  • Alvaro Sanchez, Ericsson
  • Remi Schnekenburger, CEA LIST
  • Benjamin Kamphausen, Fraunhofer ESK

Agenda Items


End-User Companies
End-user companies to give a summary of what is missing in Eclipse open source modeling, e.g. feature, support, documentation, migration, training, etc., what is their current initiatives if applicable.

  • Dominique Toupin, Ericsson overview, missing features and initiative


Possible Synergies Between Eclipse Working Group
Modeling synergies between Automotive Working Group, OPEES (PolarSys) Working Group, Multicore


Implementer Companies
What is the view of implementer companies, their core expertise, what implementation can have a big impact on open source modeling next year, low hanging fruit, what is their current initiatives, etc.

  • Stephan Eberle, itemis update, initiatives for next year


End-User Companies Business Case Brainstorming
Review first version of Modeling slides for end user companies, identify additional benefits for end user companies in order to facilitate budget approval

  • Gaël Blondelle, Obeo, feedback from the OPEES group