Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Lyo/ProjectPlans"

< Lyo
(Milestones)
m (Introduction)
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
This page contains the project plans for the Eclipse Lyo project. The first part of the plan describes the various components of Lyo and the currently planned enhancements to functionality. This plan is subject to changes based on community participation and the importance of proposed functionality to the community - we encourage anyone interested to participate. The planning process will be as open as possible and this plan will be updated as it changes. Please provide feedback on the [mailto:lyo-dev@eclipse.org lyo-dev@eclipse.org] mailing list.
 
This page contains the project plans for the Eclipse Lyo project. The first part of the plan describes the various components of Lyo and the currently planned enhancements to functionality. This plan is subject to changes based on community participation and the importance of proposed functionality to the community - we encourage anyone interested to participate. The planning process will be as open as possible and this plan will be updated as it changes. Please provide feedback on the [mailto:lyo-dev@eclipse.org lyo-dev@eclipse.org] mailing list.
 +
 +
You can also view the official release plans for Lyo at:  http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.lyo
  
 
= Lyo Components  =
 
= Lyo Components  =
Line 59: Line 61:
 
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365201 Bug 365201 - Seeking a place to post OSLC compliance baseline reports]
 
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365201 Bug 365201 - Seeking a place to post OSLC compliance baseline reports]
 
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365206 Bug 365206 - Post the OSLC Test Suite and Compliance toolkit instructions documentation]
 
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365206 Bug 365206 - Post the OSLC Test Suite and Compliance toolkit instructions documentation]
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365203 Bug 365302 - Post the "OSLC TestSuite and Compliance Test" demo/walkthrough video ]    
+
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365203 Bug 365302 - Post the "OSLC TestSuite and Compliance Test" demo/walkthrough video ]  
 
  * Improved CM MUST and SHOULD requirement coverage
 
  * Improved CM MUST and SHOULD requirement coverage
 
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365618 Bug 365618 - Complete CM MUST test cases]
 
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365618 Bug 365618 - Complete CM MUST test cases]
 +
    * Goal: 100% CM MUST
 
     * Analyze CM SHOULD coverage
 
     * Analyze CM SHOULD coverage
 
  * Improved QM and RM MUST coverage
 
  * Improved QM and RM MUST coverage
Line 78: Line 81:
 
  * Example reference implementations based on the SDK
 
  * Example reference implementations based on the SDK
 
     * CM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
 
     * CM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
    * RM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
+
* Test suite improvements
* Additional test suite enhancements to support apps written with the SDK
+
  * Refactor test suite to enable additional domain tests more easily
    * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360175 Bug 360175 - Validate ATOM responses ]
+
  * Test suite configurations for OSLC4J CM provider
    * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360176 Bug 360176 - Test for link labels ]
+
* Improved QM and RM MUST coverage
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360180 Bug 360180 - Improve tests around partial get/put ]
+
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=365622 Bug 365622 - QM and RM core spec coverage by the test suite ]
  * Improve QM MUST coverage
+
  * Provide a community webcast on Lyo content
    * Goal (dependent on community): 75%
+
 
* Improve RM MUST coverage
+
    * Goal (dependent on community): 75%
+
* Improve CM, QM, RM SHOULD and MAY coverage
+
    * Goal (dependent on community): 50%
+
  
 
* M3/Beta (Q2 2012) - theme is feature completeness
 
* M3/Beta (Q2 2012) - theme is feature completeness
  
 
  * Full Java provider and client SDKs
 
  * Full Java provider and client SDKs
  * Reference implementation completely refactored to take advantage of SDK
+
  * Re-vamped OSLC Workshop based on OSLC4J, including documentation
  * QM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
+
  * AM reference implementation based on OSLC4J  
+
 
  * Reference implementation can use pluggable RDF/application server providers
 
  * Reference implementation can use pluggable RDF/application server providers
 
   * Stub service provider for use as an OSLC starter application
 
   * Stub service provider for use as an OSLC starter application
Line 101: Line 98:
 
   * OSLC4J API reference guide
 
   * OSLC4J API reference guide
 
   * OSLC4J Tutorial and Getting started guide.
 
   * OSLC4J Tutorial and Getting started guide.
  * Improve QM MUST coverage
+
  * Additional test suite enhancements to support apps written with the SDK
     * Goal (dependent on community): 100%
+
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360175 Bug 360175 - Validate ATOM responses ]
* Improve RM MUST coverage
+
    * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360176 Bug 360176 - Test for link labels ]
     * Goal (dependent on community): 100%
+
     * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360180 Bug 360180 - Improve tests around partial get/put ]
  * Improve CM, QM, RM SHOULD and MAY coverage
+
  * Improve QM domain spec MUST coverage
 
     * Goal (dependent on community): 75%
 
     * Goal (dependent on community): 75%
 
  * Test suite enhancements and bug fixes
 
  * Test suite enhancements and bug fixes
Line 111: Line 108:
 
   * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360183 Bug 360183 - Define test suite cases in the form of scenarios ]
 
   * [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360183 Bug 360183 - Define test suite cases in the form of scenarios ]
  
* Release candidates and 1.0 (Q3 2012) - theme is stabilization and shutdown
+
* Release candidates and 1.0 (Q3 2012) - theme is release readiness
 
+
  * Some reference implementation refactored to take advantage of SDK
 +
      * QM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
 +
      * AM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
 +
  * Test suite enhancements
 +
      * Improve CM, QM, RM core and domain SHOULD and MAY coverage
 +
      * Improve RM domain spec MUST coverage
 
   * Stretch items based on community participation
 
   * Stretch items based on community participation
 
       * non-Java language SDKs (could be in earlier milestones based on participation)
 
       * non-Java language SDKs (could be in earlier milestones based on participation)
Line 120: Line 122:
 
       * Additional reference implementation and test suite enhancements
 
       * Additional reference implementation and test suite enhancements
 
   * Release shutdown work
 
   * Release shutdown work
 +
 +
= Release Review Documentation =
 +
 +
[http://wiki.eclipse.org/images/3/34/Lyo-1.0-Release-Graduation-Review.pdf Lyo release/graduation documentation]

Revision as of 13:31, 27 September 2012

Introduction

This page contains the project plans for the Eclipse Lyo project. The first part of the plan describes the various components of Lyo and the currently planned enhancements to functionality. This plan is subject to changes based on community participation and the importance of proposed functionality to the community - we encourage anyone interested to participate. The planning process will be as open as possible and this plan will be updated as it changes. Please provide feedback on the lyo-dev@eclipse.org mailing list.

You can also view the official release plans for Lyo at: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.lyo

Lyo Components

OSLC Java SDKs

  • Documentation
  • Constant strings for OSLC namespaces and providers
  • POJO model for OSLC resources
  • RDF parser and serializer
  • JSON parser and serializer
  • OSLC query parser
  • HTTP client library
  • Basic, Form, Oauth support
  • Client query builder (contributors needed)

Test suite for OSLC

The test suite for OSLC is currently available on the Lyo project. See the Lyo test suite page for details. Currently planned enhancements are

  • Add reporting capabilities
  • Improve Change Management MUST and SHOULD requirement coverage (contributors needed)
  • Improve Requirements and Change Management MUST coverage (contributors needed)
  • Improved query tests (contributors needed)
  • Improved Oauth tests
  • Tests driven by resource shape documents (contributors needed)

Reference implementations for OSLC (RIOs)

Reference implementations are currently available for the Change, Requirements and Architecture Management specifications. See the Lyo reference implementation page for details. Currently planned enhancements are:

  • Support for the Quality Management domain (contributors needed)
  • Adoption of the OSLC Java SDK
  • Refactoring to allow for pluggable RDF and application server technologies (contributors needed)
  • Improve reference implementation web UI (contributors needed)


Additional Proposed SDKs

Contributors are needed and welcome for all of the following:

  • .NET (C# or other)
  • Perl
  • Python
  • PHP
  • JavaScript

Milestones

Currently planned milestones are:

  • M1 (Q4 2011) - theme is test suite enhancements
* Compliance Reporting
   * Bug 365198 - Would like to add the compliance toolkit to the TestSuite
   * Bug 365201 - Seeking a place to post OSLC compliance baseline reports
   * Bug 365206 - Post the OSLC Test Suite and Compliance toolkit instructions documentation
   * Bug 365302 - Post the "OSLC TestSuite and Compliance Test" demo/walkthrough video     
* Improved CM MUST and SHOULD requirement coverage
   * Bug 365618 - Complete CM MUST test cases
   * Goal: 100% CM MUST
   * Analyze CM SHOULD coverage
* Improved QM and RM MUST coverage
   * Bug 365622 - QM and RM core spec coverage by the test suite 
* Suite bug fixes and enhancements
   * Bug 363478 - Add test suite configuration for Bugzilla adapter 
   * Bug 357387 - Investigate uplift of TestSuites to Apache HttpClient 4.1.x 
   * Bug 365422 - Add RDF model validation to the OSLC JUnits. 
   * Already resolved improvements  
  • M2 (Q1 2012) - theme is initial Java SDK and refactored reference implementations
* Initial Java provider and client SDK
   * Initial contribution of OSLC4J
   * Initial documentation to help developer's get started with OSLC4J
* Example reference implementations based on the SDK
   * CM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
* Test suite improvements
  * Refactor test suite to enable additional domain tests more easily 
  * Test suite configurations for OSLC4J CM provider
* Improved QM and RM MUST coverage
   * Bug 365622 - QM and RM core spec coverage by the test suite 
* Provide a community webcast on Lyo content


  • M3/Beta (Q2 2012) - theme is feature completeness
* Full Java provider and client SDKs
* Re-vamped OSLC Workshop based on OSLC4J, including documentation
* Reference implementation can use pluggable RDF/application server providers
  * Stub service provider for use as an OSLC starter application
* Documentation
  * OSLC4J API reference guide
  * OSLC4J Tutorial and Getting started guide.
* Additional test suite enhancements to support apps written with the SDK
   * Bug 360175 - Validate ATOM responses 
   * Bug 360176 - Test for link labels 
   * Bug 360180 - Improve tests around partial get/put 
* Improve QM domain spec MUST coverage
   * Goal (dependent on community): 75%
* Test suite enhancements and bug fixes
  * Bug 360184 - Use OSLC throughout the test suite
  * Bug 360183 - Define test suite cases in the form of scenarios 
  • Release candidates and 1.0 (Q3 2012) - theme is release readiness
  * Some reference implementation refactored to take advantage of SDK
     * QM reference implementation based on OSLC4J
     * AM reference implementation based on OSLC4J 
  * Test suite enhancements
     * Improve CM, QM, RM core and domain SHOULD and MAY coverage
     * Improve RM domain spec MUST coverage
  * Stretch items based on community participation
     * non-Java language SDKs (could be in earlier milestones based on participation)
        * C#/.NET
        * Scripting languages (Python, Perl, Ruby)
        * JavaScript client library
     * Additional reference implementation and test suite enhancements
  * Release shutdown work

Release Review Documentation

Lyo release/graduation documentation