Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes"

< IoT
(Oct 7, 2015 (PMC/Marketing Call))
(Agenda)
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
SIP clients can call 713@asterisk.eclipse.org, then enter pin 68764.
 
SIP clients can call 713@asterisk.eclipse.org, then enter pin 68764.
  
 +
----------------------------------------
  
= Oct 21, 2015 (Marketing Call) =
+
= Feb 1, 2017 (WG Call)=
 
+
= Participants =
+
 
+
* Jens, Eclipse SCADA
+
* Marcus, Generative Software
+
* Guillaume and Francois, LAAS
+
* Ian Skerrett
+
* Benjamin Cabé
+
* Urs, Siemens
+
* Virgil, iText
+
* Dave, Eurotech
+
* Ian C, IBM
+
 
+
 
+
= Agenda =
+
 
+
* Introduce new members
+
* Review Open IoT Challenge launch
+
* Update project release plans
+
* Review plans for IoT Unconference and IoT Day at EclipseCon
+
* Start discussion on the next IoT Developer Survey
+
* IoT Event calendar and shared exhibit space
+
* Other business
+
 
+
 
+
== Introduce new members ==
+
 
+
Generative Software
+
* Virtual Developer is a code generation tool that is now targeting Eclipse IoT projects
+
* Possible interactions with Vorto
+
 
+
Siemens
+
* IT business units is in charge of developing the platforms used to build products inside Siemens
+
* Siemens is talking to Bosch already about hawkBit, and trying to setup collaboration
+
* IoT reference stack
+
 
+
== Review Open IoT Challenge launch ==
+
 
+
* http://iot.eclipse.org/open-iot-challenge
+
 
+
== Update project releases plan ==
+
 
+
* Kura has an upcoming 1.3 release
+
* Californium 1.0 end of the month
+
* Concierge 5.0 end Oct / early Nov
+
 
+
* Press release to be done early November (Ian S)
+
 
+
== ECE / EC 2016 ==
+
 
+
* Unconference: make sure that everyone is up-to-date with what's happening with the projects
+
** We have ~10 projects presenting in the morning
+
** IoT Server Platform discussions
+
** If people want to add topics to the discussion, please let us know
+
 
+
* EclipseCON NA 2016: let us know if you would like to be in the PC for the IoT Day!
+
 
+
 
+
== Shared space at IoT events ==
+
 
+
* Embedded World and M2M Summit were very successful in 2015
+
* IoT World is a large event in San Francisco that could be a good target
+
 
+
 
+
== Other business ==
+
 
+
* Jens: would there be interest in organizing an IoT beergarten in about 1-2 months?
+
** Yes! --> Jens will start organizing something for end of January
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
= Oct 7, 2015 (PMC/Marketing Call) =
+
  
 
== Participants ==
 
== Participants ==
  
*  
+
*Dan Gross, Samsung
 
+
*James Sutton, IBM
== Agenda ==
+
*David Bericat, Red Hat
 
+
*Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ
* IoT metrics – review project metrics, identify projects who may require assistance, discuss possible improvements to current metrics.
+
*Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
* EclipseCon Europe – review the Unconference and IoT Playground agenda
+
*Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
* Update on the second edition of the Open IoT Challenge
+
*Brad Micklea, Codenvy
 
+
= Sept 23, 2015 (PMC Call) =
+
 
+
== Participants ==
+
 
+
*  
+
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
 +
=== Eclipse IoT Testbeds: review strategy and next steps. ===
 +
Work on a set of industry oriented (vertical solutions) to showcase a technical solution and showcase the Eclipse projects and vendor ecosystem.
 +
Eclipse IoT Members working together to set-up the testbed and create a demo that runs 24/7 on the Eclipse servers
 +
More details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nmdi-cmw_O-7W2qZKRHMN-3gw0WHxE75llcV0nMhS-U/edit?usp=sharing
 +
Proposed Testbed scenario around Asset Tracking Management: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KF7yxv5Dnk6b2a574HPtU5pHR5q7wvsT4skKjGDz1Q4/edit?usp=sharing
 +
There are many options for collaboration
  
* Presentation from Bosch SI on a proposal for an open source IoT software provisioning platform -  http://sp.apps.bosch-iot-cloud.com/documentation/collateral/slides/hawkBitProposal20150923.html
+
*Dan Gross: Samsung interested in participating - Kura gateway using ARTIK.
* Presentation from Red Hat on RHIOT – see https://github.com/rhiot/rhiot
+
*Laurent Lagosanto: Potential use case for Eclipse Edje.  
* IoT Commons – review wiki page and discuss next steps – see https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/Commons
+
*David Bericat: Excited and look forward to working with everyone.
* EclipseCon Europe update (Unconference, IoT Playground, …)
+
  
 +
'''Next Steps''': Stay tuned, we will be updating the group at large and scheduling individual meetings.
  
= Sept 9, 2015 (Marketing Call) =
+
=== 2. MQTT 5: Update from Ian Craggs / James Sutton on what’s in MQTT 5 and the expected impact on Eclipse Paho / Mosquitto and downstream adopters. ===
 +
'''Big set of changes:'''
 +
*Use of the publish/subscribe message pattern which provides one-to-many message distribution and decoupling of applications.
 +
*A messaging transport that is agnostic to the content of the payload.
 +
*Three qualities of service for message delivery:
 +
**At most once", where messages are delivered according to the best efforts of the operating environment. Message loss can occur. This level could be used, for example, with ambient sensor data where it does not matter if an individual reading is lost as the next one will be published soon after.
 +
**At least once", where messages are assured to arrive but duplicates can occur.
 +
**"Exactly once", where messages are assured to arrive exactly once. This level could be used, for example, with billing systems where duplicate or lost messages could lead to incorrect charges being applied.
 +
*A small transport overhead and protocol exchanges minimized to reduce network traffic.
 +
*A mechanism to notify interested parties when an abnormal disconnection occurs.
 +
 +
'''Notes from the meeting:'''
 +
*Any request sent (and reply received) can have embedded metadata. This will be used for e.g letting a publisher know about *what* happened to the packet in addition to just acknowledging it
 +
**The CONNECT packet can contain information regarding what QoS are supported by the server
 +
**Supporting QoS 2 on the server is not mandatory anymore
 +
**Scalability
 +
*It will affect the Paho client and so a new Paho client will be created.
 +
**Improve API
 +
**Feedback from community
 +
**Work nicely with the new MQTT 5 features
 +
*The complete move will take a while, MQTT 3 will not go away anytime soon. It will be a parallel process. The previous versions of the client will be maintained. Some users might choose to use MQTT 3 since it’s more lightweight.
  
== Participants ==
+
'''IMPORTANT:''' Get your feedback in as soon as possible, because in a few months it will be finalized, so review the specifications. View working draft 10 dated January 4: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?num_per_wg=10&wg_abbrev=mqtt
  
* Benjamin Cabé
+
=== 3. PMC topics: project documentation, build machines, Docker, … ===
* Ian Skerrett
+
Skipped this item - not enough PMC members on the call
* Dave Woodard
+
* Kai Hudalla
+
* Steffen Evers
+
* Kai Kreuzer
+
* Virgil Dodson
+
 
+
== Agenda ==
+
  
# Review marketing programs for remainder of 2015 and first half 2016
+
=== 4. Misc. updates ===
https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/M2MIWG/Marketing-Programs#Planned_Marketing_Programs_for_2015.2F2016
+
*WG Meeting at the Eclipse IoT Day San Jose Add your project for project update or intro: https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseIoT_SanJose2017
# Plans for a hardware catalog
+
*IoT Developer Survey Test it and give us feedback! It will go live next week. https://www.surveymonkey.net/r/Preview/?sm=PpPJLkX2kyFIkd4FpbfnijKgtSau8CTbzClUcIqMOv8UHpkGU6kxWrpBNJfYHpzC
# Update on IoT server discussion
+
*Member companies are encouraged to ask for a special link that they can use to promote the survey to their communities, and have access to answers based on this segment.
# Review plans for EclipseCon Europe
+
Open IoT Challenge: we will schedule a live hangout for project leads to answer any technical questions the participant may have. https://iot.eclipse.org/open-iot-challenge/
# Update on IoT booth at M2M Summit
+
  
= June 3, 2015 (Marketing call) =  
+
= Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call) =
  
 
== Participants ==
 
== Participants ==
 
+
*Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom
* Jens Reimann
+
*Jens Reimann, Red Hat
* Ian Skerrett
+
*Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat
* Benjamin Cabé
+
*Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI
* Kai Kreuzer
+
*Shuai li, CEA-LIST
* Virgil Dodson
+
*Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
* James Kirkland (and XX), Red Hat
+
*Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
* Ian Craggs
+
*Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
* Alois Zoitl
+
*Dave Woodard, Eurotech
* Dave Woodard
+
*Ian Craggs, IBM
 
+
*Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
 +
===Presentation new project proposal: Eclipse Ditto (Digital Twins) ===
 +
'''Presenter: Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI'''
  
* Introduction of new members
+
Bosch will be proposing a new project called “Eclipse Ditto” soon for managing state of Digital Twins. Hopefully the proposal will be made next week.
* IoT Events
+
The Ditto Project will be a mediator between IoT Devices and the state of their Digital Twins. 
** M2M Summit, JavaOne, IoT Day at EclipseCon Europe and potential Eclipse IoT event in Berlin
+
Digital Twin is not really a fixed term. Bosch views Digital Twin as is a holistic view of all capabilities and aspects of a device/product asset including its digital representation.
** A complete list of IoT events is available at https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/M2MIWG/Marketing-Programs#IoT_Events_in_2015
+
Ultimate goal is to use the digital twin as a service. There would be a higher level API to work with individual devices and you wouldn’t have to know what is happening in the background. The plan is to integrate with Eclipse Vorto and Eclipse Kapua.
* Update of Virtual IoT Meetup
+
* IoT Case Studies: I'd like to start collecting case studies on how companies are using Eclipse IoT technology.
+
* Other topics?
+
  
 +
Read the one-page: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Ditto_Project.png
  
== Introduction of new members ==
+
*Questions:
 +
Can changes to the state be made on the device of the twin, or is it only one way? The state of the device could be in both directions. Changes to the state on the device or the digital twin would change the state of the other one.
 +
A twin is not necessarily 1:1 device, a twin can represent many things (device + JVM + …)
  
* James and XX from Red Hat introduced themselves.
+
Project Proposal: https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-ditto
* Other new members who recently joined include Azul Systems and Verisign.
+
  
== IoT Events ==
+
=== Presentation by CEA-List on Model Design Environment for IoT ===
 +
'''Presenter: Shuai li CEA-List'''
  
* We are looking at having an Eclipse booth at M2M Summit and share the cost between Eclipse IoT members
+
*Slides: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:S3P-IoTModelingExecution_CEA_Primstech_MicroEJ-final.pdf
* IoT World Congress in Barcelona (same event organizer as Mobile World Congress)
+
*Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JqAPRH0bfU
** Call for papers is out
+
*For more details, contact Shuai li from CEA-List.
* IoT Day at EclipseCon Europe, similar to what we did at EclipseCon 2015
+
* Industry of Things in Berlin
+
** Can we do an Eclipse IoT Day just before or after this show?
+
  
== Virtual IoT ==
+
=== Update on Testbeds ===
 +
'''Presenter Benjamin Cabé'''
  
* 350 members and counting
+
Testbeds aim to showcase the software stack available from our open source projects, as well as the various offers that the WG members provide on top if it (cloud solutions, analytics platforms, hardware, integration services, …).
* Hundreds of replays of the webinars on YouTube
+
* Alois is interested to present 4DIAC at the end of September. Benjamin will be in touch to put the presentation in the schedule.
+
  
== IoT Case Studies ==
+
The first testbed will be a solution for Asset Tracking Management, more specifically tracking the delivery of valuable parcels. The end-to-end solution will comprise embedded sensors that can be attached to the parcels to monitor e.g temperature or vibration, IoT gateways in order to collect the sensor data (for example inside the delivery truck), process it, and report it to a cloud backend where it can be further analyzed, or made available to 3rd party apps. Members currently participating: Red Hat + Eurotech
  
* Ian would like to start harvesting case studies and success stories w/ the different projects and technologies of Eclipse IoT
+
A wiki page describes the solution https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/Testbeds/Asset_Tracking_Management and will be completed as other members jump on the train to extend the code scenario with their respective solutions.
* Ian will start reaching out to companies and put together a template of the information needed for documenting the case study
+
The code to replicate and demonstrate the testbed will be shared through https://github.com/eclipselabs/eclipseiot-testbed-assettracking.
  
== GitHub issues ==
+
Participation to the testbeds is open to any member of the IoT WG, and more details on the overall strategy are available at https://goo.gl/UeDekI.
  
* Projects have to use Bugzilla. The reason is Eclipse Fdn does not want to use vendor-specific solution (if a vendor goes away, we have an issue).
+
=== Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference ===
* Ian suggests that PMC leaders Jens and Kai take the issue to the Board level via the Committer Reps
+
'''Presenter: Ian Skerrett'''
  
= May 20, 2015 (Project leads call) =
+
We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems.
  
== Participants ==
+
Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate.
  
* Benjamin Cabé
+
=== Eclipse Leshan Press Release ===
* Ian Craggs
+
'''Presenter: Ian Skerrett'''
* Jens Reimann
+
* Kai Kreuzer
+
* Marc Mültin
+
* Virgil Dodson
+
* Ian Skerrett
+
* Dave Woodard
+
  
== Agenda ==
+
Today, February 15, we issued a press release about Eclipse Leshan and Eclipse Waakama “Eclipse IoT Announces Support for OMA LightweightM2M 1.0 Device Management Standard” Read it here: http://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170215_lwm2m.php
  
* Presentation of the new [https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/rise-v2g RiseV2G] IoT Project
+
=== IoT World plans ===
* IoT Commons, in particular current status regarding Bluetooth LE and USB
+
'''Presenter: Ian Skerrett'''
* Update on Open Source IoT server discussions
+
* LwM2M over MQTT: next steps
+
  
== RiseV2G ==
+
Eclipse IoT will have a booth at IoT World and would like to coordinate with other members. We won’t be doing the pavilion since not enough members wanted to participate, but we will get in touch soon to partner with interested members, such as IOTRACKS, that showed interest in participating.
 
+
* This project aims to implement communication between Electric Vehicals (EVs) and charging stations
+
** Based on IEC 15118 standard
+
* Quite a community already: car manufacturers, utility, ...
+
* Presented at two major international conferences over the last year
+
* The protocol is client/server. RiseV2G aims at being integrated in charging stations (server) and the car is the client
+
* Implementation is in Java
+
* The protocol can be used for other smartgrid usecases like solar panels
+
 
+
* Code will be hosted on GitHub
+
 
+
* Marc indicates that there could be interesting collaboration opportunities with Eclipse SmartHome.
+
** Kai indicates there is already a new binding in Eclipse SmartHome for Charging Stations (KeyBar(?))
+
 
+
== IoT Commons ==
+
 
+
* Our goal should will be to work on providing open source implementations of existing APIs (see eg. javax.comm, javax.usb, OSGi Alliance RFCs)
+
* If we don't have the API (e.g. Modbus): what should we do?
+
* Benjamin will provide a metadata "template" to make it easier to document the dependencies.
+
 
+
== IoT Server ==
+
 
+
* Working group members are welcome to join the discussions regarding [[IoT/IoTServerPlatform]]
+
 
+
== LwM2M over MQTT ==
+
 
+
* Next steps: discussing proper integration of the work being done at IBM India in Leshan
+
 
+
= Mar 25, 2015 (Project leads call) =
+
 
+
== Participants ==
+
 
+
* Benjamin Cabé
+
* Ian Craggs
+
* Julien Vermillard
+
* Luca Dazi
+
 
+
== Agenda ==
+
 
+
* Update on the IoT Challenge. Deadline was yesterday and Benjamin will update on the submitted solution and relationship with Eclipse IoT projects.
+
* IP and process issues. Quick roundtable on any outstanding CQs or process issues that projects may have.
+
* LwM2M over MQTT update.
+
 
+
== IoT Challenge ==
+
 
+
* The final entries have been submitted. See http://openiotchallenge.tumblr.com/
+
* The results will be announced shortly
+
* Many great submissions around MQTT, Kura, MQTT-SN, LwM2M so all the project leads are encouraged to have a look and engage with the participants
+
 
+
== IP and Process Issues ==
+
 
+
* Benjamin asks the project leads attending the call if they have process topics to discuss.
+
 
+
The following topics were discussed during the call:
+
 
+
* Julien is inquiring about the time it takes to do a formal release, and asks about how long it takes to get an IP log approved, and a release approved.
+
** If the project leadership has been managing its contribution properly, and granted that there are no problematic CQs, the IP log is approved in less than a week
+
** Once the IP log is approved, at the project review can be scheduled and the review period cannot be less than a week.
+
** This [[Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Cycle#Release_Review|wiki page and associated diagram]] summarizes very well the workflow.
+
** For the record, a project may decide to submit an IP log for approval even when a release isn't planned. This is useful whenever some major contributions or 3rd party libraries are added to the codebase, and in general to avoid rushing a few days before a release.
+
 
+
* Ian Craggs rises the point of some projects he's been trying to recruit as Paho components, and who are currently hosted on Github. One of the reasons these projects wouldn't move to Eclipse was the fact they would lose Github issues and a very "low barrier" for bugs/feature requests to be reported.
+
** Julien highlights that the current situation is pretty messy: some Eclipse projects recently created have Github issues enabled, or have had GH issues disabled by Eclipse webmaster and lost the existing issues that people already opened.
+
** Someone has reminded that GH pull requests are very similar to GH issues, and are allowed.
+
** If there is a '''legal''' reason to not allow Github issues, the projects would like to know. If there is a technical reason, it seems {{bug|442828|7}} would be a viable answer. In general, the project leaders all expressed that they don't have a clear position from EMO that they can use to explain to their community why GH issues aren't allowed.
+
** Ian Craggs notes that a solution to the problem might be to consider Github issues with different levels of contribution, and that in several cases, an issue is just opened as a way to engage the discussion. If a GH issue ends up being an actual contribution, the project leadership could "clone" the conversation on Bugzilla, if that is needed for a legal reason.
+
 
+
* Still on the topics of Github development, it is note that some projects avec their GitHub wiki enabled.
+
** Is this a bug? Or, again, what is EMO's official position?
+
 
+
* Both Ian and Julien express concerns about libraries coming from the NodeJS or Javascript ecosystem who prove difficult to be cleared, IP-wise (libuv for Mosquitto, Bootstrap or Angular libraries for Leshan...)
+
** Julien wonders why Eclipse projects can't use libraries that do not have proper CLAs, but seem to be used widely. "Why is everybody using NodeJS and NodeJS libraries if there is a risk?"
+
** Benjamin will reach out to the Orion project leadership to understand better how they work with 3rd party JS dependencies
+
 
+
== LwM2M over MQTT ==
+
 
+
* A meeting is scheduled for April 2, to discuss the current prototype implemented by IBM India during the Open IoT Challenge, and prepare next steps.
+
* [[IoT/LwM2M_MQTT_Binding/Meeting_minutes|Wiki page]]
+
 
+
= Feb 12, 2015 (Marketing call) =
+
 
+
 
+
== Participants ==
+
 
+
* Jens
+
* Ian Skerrett
+
* Benjamin
+
* Dave Woodard
+
* Kai Kreuzer
+
* Mahdi Ben Alaya
+
* Virgil Dodson
+
* Ian Craggs
+
 
+
 
+
== Agenda ==
+
 
+
- IoT Challenge results to date
+
- IoT Developer Survey - review questions in attached document
+
- Web site updates
+
- EclipseCon and IoT Day update
+
 
+
== IoT Challenge ==
+
 
+
* Participants' projects are highlighted on http://openiotchallenge.tumblr.com
+
* Four projects are blogging actively and showing interesting results. Several "tips and tricks" and "tutorials" are being created as part of the blogging activity of the participants. Eclipse IoT projects should make sure to relay those in their own mailing lists, wikis, etc.
+
* There are several solutions that are using Kura, Leshan, and MQTT/MQTT-SN
+
* Deadline for final submissions will be March 23rd (initially Feb 27)
+
 
+
== IoT Developer Survey ==
+
 
+
* The survey should help build awareness about Eclipse IoT by writing a report
+
* We probably don't want more than 20 questions
+
* Question 10 on protocols should probably be split in two sections: messaging protocols and industrial protocols
+
* "Is open source an important factor for your IoT solution?" or "What's your organization's view on OSS: never use it, considering using it, ..."
+
 
+
== Web site updates ==
+
 
+
* Benjamin and Ian are working on revamping the iot.eclipse.org website since it's start to show its age and is not adapted anymore to the numbers of projects and technologies we have
+
* There should be showable results in the next couple weeks.
+
 
+
== IoT Day ==
+
 
+
* The help of the Eclipse IoT members to recruit participants is greatly appreciated :)
+
 
+
= Jan 28, 2015 (Project leads call) =
+
 
+
== Agenda ==
+
 
+
* Update of project release plans.
+
* GPG signing update. Benjamin will provide an update on setting up GPG signing for IoT * projects.
+
* LWM2M over MQTT – Update on the initial discussions regarding running LwM2M over MQTT https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/LwM2M_MQTT_Binding
+
* Update on the IoT Challenge
+
 
+
 
+
== Attendees ==
+
 
+
* Benjamin
+
* Jens
+
* Michael Bradley
+
* Kai K
+
* Mahdi
+
* Ian Craggs
+
* Marco
+
* Virgil
+
 
+
== Update of project release plans ==
+
 
+
* Paho
+
** Paho 1.1 will include:
+
*** .Net and WinRT by Paolo Patierno
+
*** Formal release of the embedded client
+
*** Formal release of the Android service
+
*** Service update of all the other clients
+
** Next version will be Paho 1.2
+
*** to be released in Mars
+
 
+
* SmartHome
+
** No release in preparation (there was a release announced in Dec. but it has been withdrawn)
+
** Ongoing work on REST API
+
*** Automated and interactive documentation of the REST API using Swagger
+
 
+
* SCADA
+
** 0.2 release is out
+
*** built on Monday, ongoing testing. To be announced tomorrow.
+
*** inclusion of IEC standards is finally a GO!
+
** next version will be 0.3
+
*** more functionality back-ported from OpenSCADA
+
*** deprecate old functionality
+
*** to be released in ~6 months
+
 
+
* Kura
+
** Kura released just before Christmas a 1.1
+
*** support for openJDK Device I/O API
+
*** support for USB HID
+
*** service release of the network management bits
+
*** upgrade to Paho 1.1
+
** Moving forward, a 1.1.1 is planned for February
+
 
+
* Mahdi
+
** OM2M first release planned for March
+
*** CoAP and HTTP bindings
+
*** better SQL/database abstraction
+
*** backend interface
+
** After that (Sept), a bridge to OneM2M will be added + a GUI
+
 
+
== Project release schedule ==
+
 
+
* Eclipse release train: every project joins and tools+plugins are synchronized
+
* However for IoT we don't really have one single set of tools, but it would be great to provide a better view (calendar?) of what is in the pipe for the projects
+
** PMI improvement?
+
** Jens suggests that this is a manual web page on iot.eclipse.org, or it could use the PMI API
+
 
+
== GPG Signing update ==
+
 
+
* https://wiki.eclipse.org/GPG
+
 
+
== LwM2M over MQTT ==
+
 
+
* https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/LwM2M_MQTT_Binding
+
 
+
 
+
== IoT Challenge ==
+
 
+
* http://openiotchallenge.tumblr.com
+
* Gift cards have been sent to 10 projects.
+
* Eclipse IoT Projects are encouraged to monitor Twitter and help the participants with any questions they may have
+
 
+
= Jan 15, 2015 (Marketing call) =
+
 
+
== Agenda ==
+
 
+
* IoT Developer Survey
+
* IoT Challenge
+
* Web site updates
+
* Eclipse IoT Day in Dresden Germany
+
* IoT Day in Grenoble, France
+
 
+
== Attendees ==
+
 
+
* Benjamin Cabé
+
* Ian Skerrett
+
* Jens Reimann
+
* Dave Woodard
+
* Julien Vermillard
+
* Bernd Fischer
+
* Mahdi Ben Alaya
+
 
+
== IoT Developer Survey ==
+
 
+
* Goal is to understand what's going on in the market, and esp. for developers
+
* Jens volunteered to help elaborate the questions
+
 
+
== IoT Challenge ==
+
 
+
* Deadline to enter is January 17
+
* We have around 20 entries so far so we expect to end up with 30+
+
* Participants will have to blog about their project and we will be promoting the content
+
 
+
== Web site updates ==
+
 
+
* iot.eclipse.org needs some love
+
* On the home page:
+
** List the projects
+
** Improve the contact form
+
* Benjamin and Ian will draft an update for the website
+
 
+
== Eclipse IoT Day in Dresden Germany ==
+
 
+
* Eclipse and IoT Workshop on March 18th
+
* Looking for speakers
+
* 50+ participants
+
* SmartHome, EclipseSCADA, Vorto
+
* Bernd will promote the event on the Eclipse mailing list
+
 
+
== IoT Day in Grenoble, France ==
+
 
+
* March 30-31 in Grenoble
+
* See https://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse_IoT_Day_Grenoble_2015
+
* One day sessions, one day workshop (OpenHAB, MQTT, RIOT OS)
+
  
 +
=== IoT Developer Survey ===
 +
'''Presenter: Roxanne Joncas'''
  
 +
On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community.
 +
*Link to promote/share: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/iotsurvey2017eclipseiot
 +
*Graphic for promotion: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Iotsurveypartners.png
  
 
----------------------------------------
 
----------------------------------------
Line 483: Line 159:
 
= Archives =
 
= Archives =
  
== 2014 ==
+
* [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2016 Archives]]
 
+
* [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2015 Archives]]
[[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2014 Archives]]
+
* [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2014 Archives]]
 
+
* [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2013 Archives]]
== 2013 ==
+
* [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2012 Archives]]
 
+
* [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2011 Archives]]
[[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2013 Archives]]
+
 
+
== 2012 ==
+
 
+
[[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2012 Archives]]
+
 
+
== 2011 ==
+
 
+
[[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2011 Archives]]
+

Revision as of 10:11, 20 February 2017

The Internet of Things Industry Working Group is holding bi-weekly calls on Wednesdays, at 12pm ET.
Participation to these calls is restricted to members of the IWG, but the minutes are public. We alternate between marketing-focused calls (upcoming events coordination, community outreach, etc.), and technical calls mostly targeting project leads, to synchronize cross-project activities.

The meetings are held via teleconference. The regular call-in numbers are shown below (if possible, please used caller paid numbers). There are a few local / toll-free dial in numbers, but you may want to setup a SIP client on your computer if possible.

  • North America 1-866-569-4992
  • Germany 49-692-2224-6059
  • France 33-(0)-17-070-8535
  • UK 0800-033-7806
  • Switzerland 41-44-580-2115
  • Sweden 46-85-063-8386
  • Italy 003-902-3604-8268

Participant conference extension: 713, then enter pin 68764

SIP clients can call 713@asterisk.eclipse.org, then enter pin 68764.


Feb 1, 2017 (WG Call)

Participants

  • Dan Gross, Samsung
  • James Sutton, IBM
  • David Bericat, Red Hat
  • Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ
  • Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
  • Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
  • Brad Micklea, Codenvy

Agenda

Eclipse IoT Testbeds: review strategy and next steps.

Work on a set of industry oriented (vertical solutions) to showcase a technical solution and showcase the Eclipse projects and vendor ecosystem. Eclipse IoT Members working together to set-up the testbed and create a demo that runs 24/7 on the Eclipse servers More details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nmdi-cmw_O-7W2qZKRHMN-3gw0WHxE75llcV0nMhS-U/edit?usp=sharing Proposed Testbed scenario around Asset Tracking Management: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KF7yxv5Dnk6b2a574HPtU5pHR5q7wvsT4skKjGDz1Q4/edit?usp=sharing There are many options for collaboration

  • Dan Gross: Samsung interested in participating - Kura gateway using ARTIK.
  • Laurent Lagosanto: Potential use case for Eclipse Edje.
  • David Bericat: Excited and look forward to working with everyone.

Next Steps: Stay tuned, we will be updating the group at large and scheduling individual meetings.

2. MQTT 5: Update from Ian Craggs / James Sutton on what’s in MQTT 5 and the expected impact on Eclipse Paho / Mosquitto and downstream adopters.

Big set of changes:

  • Use of the publish/subscribe message pattern which provides one-to-many message distribution and decoupling of applications.
  • A messaging transport that is agnostic to the content of the payload.
  • Three qualities of service for message delivery:
    • At most once", where messages are delivered according to the best efforts of the operating environment. Message loss can occur. This level could be used, for example, with ambient sensor data where it does not matter if an individual reading is lost as the next one will be published soon after.
    • At least once", where messages are assured to arrive but duplicates can occur.
    • "Exactly once", where messages are assured to arrive exactly once. This level could be used, for example, with billing systems where duplicate or lost messages could lead to incorrect charges being applied.
  • A small transport overhead and protocol exchanges minimized to reduce network traffic.
  • A mechanism to notify interested parties when an abnormal disconnection occurs.

Notes from the meeting:

  • Any request sent (and reply received) can have embedded metadata. This will be used for e.g letting a publisher know about *what* happened to the packet in addition to just acknowledging it
    • The CONNECT packet can contain information regarding what QoS are supported by the server
    • Supporting QoS 2 on the server is not mandatory anymore
    • Scalability
  • It will affect the Paho client and so a new Paho client will be created.
    • Improve API
    • Feedback from community
    • Work nicely with the new MQTT 5 features
  • The complete move will take a while, MQTT 3 will not go away anytime soon. It will be a parallel process. The previous versions of the client will be maintained. Some users might choose to use MQTT 3 since it’s more lightweight.

IMPORTANT: Get your feedback in as soon as possible, because in a few months it will be finalized, so review the specifications. View working draft 10 dated January 4: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?num_per_wg=10&wg_abbrev=mqtt

3. PMC topics: project documentation, build machines, Docker, …

Skipped this item - not enough PMC members on the call

4. Misc. updates

Open IoT Challenge: we will schedule a live hangout for project leads to answer any technical questions the participant may have. https://iot.eclipse.org/open-iot-challenge/

Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call)

Participants

  • Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom
  • Jens Reimann, Red Hat
  • Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat
  • Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI
  • Shuai li, CEA-LIST
  • Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
  • Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
  • Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
  • Dave Woodard, Eurotech
  • Ian Craggs, IBM
  • Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS

Agenda

Presentation new project proposal: Eclipse Ditto (Digital Twins)

Presenter: Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI

Bosch will be proposing a new project called “Eclipse Ditto” soon for managing state of Digital Twins. Hopefully the proposal will be made next week. The Ditto Project will be a mediator between IoT Devices and the state of their Digital Twins. Digital Twin is not really a fixed term. Bosch views Digital Twin as is a holistic view of all capabilities and aspects of a device/product asset including its digital representation. Ultimate goal is to use the digital twin as a service. There would be a higher level API to work with individual devices and you wouldn’t have to know what is happening in the background. The plan is to integrate with Eclipse Vorto and Eclipse Kapua.

Read the one-page: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Ditto_Project.png

  • Questions:

Can changes to the state be made on the device of the twin, or is it only one way? The state of the device could be in both directions. Changes to the state on the device or the digital twin would change the state of the other one. A twin is not necessarily 1:1 device, a twin can represent many things (device + JVM + …)

Project Proposal: https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-ditto

Presentation by CEA-List on Model Design Environment for IoT

Presenter: Shuai li CEA-List

Update on Testbeds

Presenter Benjamin Cabé

Testbeds aim to showcase the software stack available from our open source projects, as well as the various offers that the WG members provide on top if it (cloud solutions, analytics platforms, hardware, integration services, …).

The first testbed will be a solution for Asset Tracking Management, more specifically tracking the delivery of valuable parcels. The end-to-end solution will comprise embedded sensors that can be attached to the parcels to monitor e.g temperature or vibration, IoT gateways in order to collect the sensor data (for example inside the delivery truck), process it, and report it to a cloud backend where it can be further analyzed, or made available to 3rd party apps. Members currently participating: Red Hat + Eurotech

A wiki page describes the solution https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/Testbeds/Asset_Tracking_Management and will be completed as other members jump on the train to extend the code scenario with their respective solutions. The code to replicate and demonstrate the testbed will be shared through https://github.com/eclipselabs/eclipseiot-testbed-assettracking.

Participation to the testbeds is open to any member of the IoT WG, and more details on the overall strategy are available at https://goo.gl/UeDekI.

Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference

Presenter: Ian Skerrett

We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems.

Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate.

Eclipse Leshan Press Release

Presenter: Ian Skerrett

Today, February 15, we issued a press release about Eclipse Leshan and Eclipse Waakama “Eclipse IoT Announces Support for OMA LightweightM2M 1.0 Device Management Standard” Read it here: http://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170215_lwm2m.php

IoT World plans

Presenter: Ian Skerrett

Eclipse IoT will have a booth at IoT World and would like to coordinate with other members. We won’t be doing the pavilion since not enough members wanted to participate, but we will get in touch soon to partner with interested members, such as IOTRACKS, that showed interest in participating.

IoT Developer Survey

Presenter: Roxanne Joncas

On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community.


Archives

Back to the top