Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Higgins.owl 1.0"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | This page describes higgins.owl. Versions: | |
| + | * [http://spwiki.editme.com/Higgins0-5-5 Higgins.owl version 0.5.5] --the latest draft under review | ||
| + | * http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl --the currently published version | ||
''Note: The properties of the Context container itself are attached to special object called ContextObject within the instance data and also described in the ontology.'' | ''Note: The properties of the Context container itself are attached to special object called ContextObject within the instance data and also described in the ontology.'' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Classes== | ==Classes== | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 11 September 2006
This page describes higgins.owl. Versions:
- Higgins.owl version 0.5.5 --the latest draft under review
- http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins.owl --the currently published version
Note: The properties of the Context container itself are attached to special object called ContextObject within the instance data and also described in the ontology.
Contents
Classes
- AttributeMetadata
- 0..1 hasSource
- 0..N hasTimeSpan
- 0..1 lastModified
- 0..1 syncConflict
- AttributeValue
- 0..1 hasMetadata
- 0..1 objectValue
- 0..1 datatypeValue
- ContextObject
- 0..N hasContextRelationships
- ContextRelationship
- 0..N contextURI
- DatatypeAttributeValue
- 1..N datypeValue
- DigitalSubject (see Digital Subject)
- 1..1 uniqueIdentifier
- 0..N hasTimeSpan
- ObjectAttributeValue
- 0..N objectValue
- SubjectRelationship
- 1..1 contextURI
- 1..1 subjectCUID
- TimeSpan
- 1..1 validFrom
- 1..1 validTo
Subclasses of DatatypeAttributeValue
- StringDatatypeAttributeValue
- ...we need to create all the rest here (DateAttributeValue, NonNegativeIntegerAttributeValue, etc. for each of the XML Schema literal types used by OWL)
DataType (literal valued) Properties
- contextURI - domain(ContextRelationship, SubjectRelationship), range("anyURI")
- datatypeValue - domain(AttributeValue)
- identifier - domain(AttributeStatement), range(xsd:normalizedString)
- lastModified - domain(AttributeMetadata), range(xsd:dateTime)
- subjectCUID - domain(SubjectRelationship), range(xsd:normalizedString)
- syncConflict - domain(AttributeMetadata), range(xsd:boolean)
- uniqueIdentifier - domain(DigitalSubject), range(xsd:normalizedString). Uniquely identifies a DigitalSubject within a context
- validFrom - domain(TimeSpan), range(xsd:date)
- validTo - domain(TimeSpan), range(xsd:date)
Sub-Properties of datatypeValue
- stringDatatypeValue - range(xsd:string)
Object (object valued) Properties
- hasContextRelationship - domain(ContextObject), range(ContextRelationship)
- hasMetadata - domain(AttributeStatement), range(AttributeMetadata)
- hasSource - domain(AttributeMetadata), range(SubjectRelationship). The value is a DigitalSubjectRelationship that indicates the authoritative source of the AttributeStatement having this property
- hasTimeSpan - domain(DigitalSubject, AttributeMetadata), range(TimeSpan)
- objectValue - domain(AttributeValue)
Open Issues
- We've agreed to add a "source" property to the Digital Subject's CUID. But does this really make sense at the DS instance level?