Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Equinox Performance Notes"
(→Significant Dates in History) |
(→Significant Dates in History) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Significant Dates in History== | ==Significant Dates in History== | ||
| − | * I20061107-0800 - The JARs in the SDK were signed | + | * I20061107-0800 - The JARs in the SDK were signed. Previous I-build (M3 or I20061102-1715) is unsigned. |
* On or after 20070217 - The updated test framework was used in performance tests. The new one doesn't add "-dev bin". (Which is a good thing.) | * On or after 20070217 - The updated test framework was used in performance tests. The new one doesn't add "-dev bin". (Which is a good thing.) | ||
* ?? - class loader boot delegation was changed | * ?? - class loader boot delegation was changed | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 12 April 2007
Significant Dates in History
- I20061107-0800 - The JARs in the SDK were signed. Previous I-build (M3 or I20061102-1715) is unsigned.
- On or after 20070217 - The updated test framework was used in performance tests. The new one doesn't add "-dev bin". (Which is a good thing.)
- ?? - class loader boot delegation was changed
Notes
- We need to ensure that JARs are signed (or not signed) in both the new tests and the baselines
- Potential factors in UI Application startup tests
- In 3.2 the SDK's default perspective was the Resource Perspective and in 3.3 it is the Java perspective
- The Welcome screen is also opened in the UI App startup test