Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Equinox Performance Notes"

(Significant Dates in History)
(Significant Dates in History)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Significant Dates in History==
 
==Significant Dates in History==
* I20061107-0800 - The JARs in the SDK were signed (previous I-build is M3 or I20061102-1715)
+
* I20061107-0800 - The JARs in the SDK were signed. Previous I-build (M3 or I20061102-1715) is unsigned.
 
* On or after 20070217 - The updated test framework was used in performance tests. The new one doesn't add "-dev bin". (Which is a good thing.)
 
* On or after 20070217 - The updated test framework was used in performance tests. The new one doesn't add "-dev bin". (Which is a good thing.)
 
* ?? - class loader boot delegation was changed
 
* ?? - class loader boot delegation was changed

Revision as of 17:23, 12 April 2007

Significant Dates in History

  • I20061107-0800 - The JARs in the SDK were signed. Previous I-build (M3 or I20061102-1715) is unsigned.
  • On or after 20070217 - The updated test framework was used in performance tests. The new one doesn't add "-dev bin". (Which is a good thing.)
  •  ?? - class loader boot delegation was changed

Notes

  • We need to ensure that JARs are signed (or not signed) in both the new tests and the baselines
  • Potential factors in UI Application startup tests
    • In 3.2 the SDK's default perspective was the Resource Perspective and in 3.3 it is the Java perspective
    • The Welcome screen is also opened in the UI App startup test